Re: [PATCH] Driver core: Reduce the level of request_firmware() messages

[Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>]

On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 01:43:54AM +0530, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
> Hello Rafael,
> 
> On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 1:24 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> > On Sunday 28 February 2010, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sun, 2010-02-28 at 13:13 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> > On Sunday 28 February 2010, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
> >> > > On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 2:13 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> >> > > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
> >> > > >
> >> > > > The messages from _request_firmware() informing that firmware is
> >> > > > being requested or built-in firmware is going to be used are printed
> >> > > > at KERN_INFO, which produces lots of noise on systems with huge
> >> > > > numbers of AMD CPUs.  Reduce the level of these messages to
> >> > > > KERN_DEBUG to get rid of that noise.
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> > > Which firmware we are using is very useful information. Because of
> >> > > huge numbers of CPUs it seems noise then better provide the
> >> > > information for first cpu and for the rest of the CPUs you can show by
> >> > > KERN_DEBUG.
> >> >
> >> > That would have been better indeed, but the problem is _request_firmware()
> >> > doesn't allow us to change the level of its messages on demand.
> >>
> >> Can we try this :
> >>
> >>       if (smp_processor_id())
> >>               dev_dbg(..);
> >>       else
> >>               dev_info(..);
> >
> > Well, it doesn't look particularly nice, does it?
> >
> > Besides, say we're requesting firmware for a non-CPU device which happens
> > to run on CPU1.  Then, dev_dbg() will be used, which most likely is not what we
> > want.
> >
> 
> Yes, you are right. But atleast can you try it once and show the
> output with and without this.

Was there ever a resolution to this?  Rafael, do you want me to apply
your original patch now?

thanks,

greg k-h