From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965873Ab0CPADt (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Mar 2010 20:03:49 -0400 Received: from e5.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.145]:45675 "EHLO e5.ny.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965842Ab0CPADq (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Mar 2010 20:03:46 -0400 Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 17:03:43 -0700 From: "Paul E. McKenney" To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: mingo@elte.hu, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca, josh@joshtriplett.org, dvhltc@us.ibm.com, niv@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, dhowells@redhat.com, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, arnd@arndb.de Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu] rcu: make rcu_read_lock_bh_held() allow for disabled BH Message-ID: <20100316000343.GA25857@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reply-To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15+20070412 (2007-04-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Disabling BH can stand in for rcu_read_lock_bh(), and this patch updates rcu_read_lock_bh_held() to allow for this. In order to avoid include-file hell, this function is moved out of line to kernel/rcupdate.c. Reported-by: Arnd Bergmann Reported-by: Eric Dumazet Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney --- include/linux/rcupdate.h | 19 ++++--------------- kernel/rcupdate.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h index 3024050..e1bdc4b 100644 --- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h +++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h @@ -123,22 +123,11 @@ static inline int rcu_read_lock_held(void) return lock_is_held(&rcu_lock_map); } -/** - * rcu_read_lock_bh_held - might we be in RCU-bh read-side critical section? - * - * If CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING is selected and enabled, returns nonzero iff in - * an RCU-bh read-side critical section. In absence of CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING, - * this assumes we are in an RCU-bh read-side critical section unless it can - * prove otherwise. - * - * Check rcu_scheduler_active to prevent false positives during boot. +/* + * rcu_read_lock_bh_held() is defined out of line to avoid #include-file + * hell. */ -static inline int rcu_read_lock_bh_held(void) -{ - if (!debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled()) - return 1; - return lock_is_held(&rcu_bh_lock_map); -} +extern int rcu_read_lock_bh_held(void); /** * rcu_read_lock_sched_held - might we be in RCU-sched read-side critical section? diff --git a/kernel/rcupdate.c b/kernel/rcupdate.c index f1125c1..63fe254 100644 --- a/kernel/rcupdate.c +++ b/kernel/rcupdate.c @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC static struct lock_class_key rcu_lock_key; @@ -66,6 +67,28 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_sched_lock_map); int rcu_scheduler_active __read_mostly; EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_scheduler_active); +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC + +/** + * rcu_read_lock_bh_held - might we be in RCU-bh read-side critical section? + * + * Check for bottom half being disabled, which covers both the + * CONFIG_PROVE_RCU and not cases. Note that if someone uses + * rcu_read_lock_bh(), but then later enables BH, lockdep (if enabled) + * will show the situation. + * + * Check debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled() to prevent false positives during boot. + */ +int rcu_read_lock_bh_held(void) +{ + if (!debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled()) + return 1; + return in_softirq(); +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_read_lock_bh_held); + +#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC */ + /* * This function is invoked towards the end of the scheduler's initialization * process. Before this is called, the idle task might contain -- 1.6.6