public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	stable@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] tracing: Do not record user stack trace from NMI context
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 03:08:01 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100317020759.GE5258@nowhere> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1268585920.13400.14.camel@localhost>

On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 12:58:40PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-03-14 at 11:27 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Wow, that's a race :)
> > 
> > In perf this is dealt with a special copy_from_user_nmi()
> > (see in arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c)
> > 
> > May be save_stack_trace_user() should use that instead
> > of a __copy_from_user_inatomic() based thing, just to
> > cover such NMI corner race case.
> > 
> 
> Yeah, we should move the __copy_from_user_nmi() out of the perf code and
> into the normal uaccess code. Then we could do as you suggest, and have
> the stack code do:
> 
> if (in_nmi())
> 	__copy_from_user_nmi();
> else
> 	__copy_from_user_inatomic();
> 
> Or maybe it would be best to have the __copy_from_user_inatomic() handle
> it.


Yeah, agreed.


  reply	other threads:[~2010-03-17  2:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-13  2:56 [PATCH 0/5][GIT PULL][2.6.34] tracing: urgent fixes Steven Rostedt
2010-03-13  2:56 ` [PATCH 1/5] ring-buffer: Move disabled check into preempt disable section Steven Rostedt
2010-03-13  2:56 ` [PATCH 2/5] function-graph: Init curr_ret_stack with ret_stack Steven Rostedt
2010-03-14 10:10   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-13  2:56 ` [PATCH 3/5] tracing: Use same local variable when resetting the ring buffer Steven Rostedt
2010-03-13  2:56 ` [PATCH 4/5] tracing: Disable buffer switching when starting or stopping trace Steven Rostedt
2010-03-13  2:57 ` [PATCH 5/5] tracing: Do not record user stack trace from NMI context Steven Rostedt
2010-03-14 10:27   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-14 15:28     ` Steven Rostedt
2010-03-14 16:58     ` Steven Rostedt
2010-03-17  2:08       ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2010-03-14 22:05   ` John Kacur
2010-03-14 22:29     ` Steven Rostedt
2010-03-13  7:25 ` [PATCH 0/5][GIT PULL][2.6.34] tracing: urgent fixes Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100317020759.GE5258@nowhere \
    --to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=stable@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox