From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Cc: Ben Gamari <bgamari.foss@gmail.com>,
tytso@mit.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Olly Betts <olly@survex.com>,
martin f krafft <madduck@madduck.net>
Subject: Re: Poor interactive performance with I/O loads with fsync()ing
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 10:37:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100317093704.GA17146@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100317045350.GA2869@laptop>
* Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 08:31:12AM -0700, Ben Gamari wrote:
> > Hey all,
> >
> > Recently I started using the Xapian-based notmuch mail client for everyday
> > use. One of the things I was quite surprised by after the switch was the
> > incredible hit in interactive performance that is observed during database
> > updates. Things are particularly bad during runs of 'notmuch new,' which scans
> > the file system looking for new messages and adds them to the database.
> > Specifically, the worst of the performance hit appears to occur when the
> > database is being updated.
> >
> > During these periods, even small chunks of I/O can become minute-long ordeals.
> > It is common for latencytop to show 30 second long latencies for page faults
> > and writing pages. Interactive performance is absolutely abysmal, with other
> > unrelated processes feeling horrible latencies, causing media players,
> > editors, and even terminals to grind to a halt.
> >
> > Despite the system being clearly I/O bound, iostat shows pitiful disk
> > throughput (700kByte/second read, 300 kByte/second write). Certainly this poor
> > performance can, at least to some degree, be attributable to the fact that
> > Xapian uses fdatasync() to ensure data consistency. That being said, it seems
> > like Xapian's page usage causes horrible thrashing, hence the performance hit
> > on unrelated processes.
>
> Where are the unrelated processes waiting? Can you get a sample of several
> backtraces? (/proc/<pid>/stack should do it)
A call-graph profile will show the precise reason for IO latencies, and their
relatively likelihood.
It's really simple to do it with a recent kernel. Firstly, enable
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IO_TRACE=y, CONFIG_EVENT_PROFILE=y:
Kernel performance events and counters (PERF_EVENTS) [Y/?] y
Tracepoint profiling sources (EVENT_PROFILE) [Y/n/?] y
Support for tracing block IO actions (BLK_DEV_IO_TRACE) [N/y/?] y
(boot into this kernel)
Then build perf via:
cd tools/perf/
make -j install
and then capture 10 seconds of the DB workload:
perf record -f -g -a -e block:block_rq_issue -c 1 sleep 10
[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.251 MB perf.data (~10977 samples) ]
and look at the call-graph output:
perf report
# Samples: 5
#
# Overhead Command Shared Object Symbol
# ........ ............... ................. ......
#
80.00% kjournald [kernel.kallsyms] [k] perf_trace_block_rq_issue
|
--- perf_trace_block_rq_issue
scsi_request_fn
|
|--50.00%-- __blk_run_queue
| cfq_insert_request
| elv_insert
| __elv_add_request
| __make_request
| generic_make_request
| submit_bio
| submit_bh
| sync_dirty_buffer
| journal_commit_transaction
| kjournald
| kthread
| kernel_thread_helper
|
--50.00%-- __generic_unplug_device
generic_unplug_device
blk_unplug
blk_backing_dev_unplug
sync_buffer
__wait_on_bit
out_of_line_wait_on_bit
__wait_on_buffer
wait_on_buffer
journal_commit_transaction
kjournald
kthread
kernel_thread_helper
20.00% as [kernel.kallsyms] [k] perf_trace_block_rq_issue
|
--- perf_trace_block_rq_issue
scsi_request_fn
__generic_unplug_device
generic_unplug_device
blk_unplug
blk_backing_dev_unplug
page_cache_async_readahead
generic_file_aio_read
do_sync_read
vfs_read
sys_read
system_call_fastpath
0x39f8ad4930
This (very simple) example had 80% of the IO in kjournald and 20% of it in
'as'. The precise call-paths of IO issues are visible.
For general scheduler context-switch events you can use:
perf record -f -g -a -e context-switches -c 1 sleep 10
see 'perf list' for all events.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-17 9:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-16 15:31 Poor interactive performance with I/O loads with fsync()ing Ben Gamari
2010-03-17 1:24 ` tytso
2010-03-17 3:18 ` Ben Gamari
2010-03-17 3:30 ` tytso
2010-03-17 4:31 ` Ben Gamari
2010-03-26 3:16 ` Ben Gamari
2010-03-17 4:53 ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-17 9:37 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2010-03-26 3:31 ` Ben Gamari
2010-04-09 15:21 ` Ben Gamari
2010-03-26 3:28 ` Ben Gamari
2010-03-23 19:51 ` Jesper Krogh
2010-03-26 3:13 ` Ben Gamari
2010-03-28 1:20 ` Ben Gamari
2010-03-28 1:29 ` Ben Gamari
2010-03-28 3:42 ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-03-28 14:06 ` Ben Gamari
2010-03-28 22:08 ` Andi Kleen
2010-04-09 14:56 ` Ben Gamari
2010-04-11 15:03 ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-11 16:35 ` Ben Gamari
2010-04-11 17:20 ` Andi Kleen
2010-04-11 18:16 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-04-11 18:42 ` Andi Kleen
2010-04-11 21:54 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-04-11 23:43 ` Hans-Peter Jansen
2010-04-12 0:22 ` Dave Chinner
2010-04-14 18:40 ` Ric Wheeler
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-03-23 11:28 Pawel S
2010-03-23 13:27 ` Jens Axboe
2010-03-26 3:35 ` Ben Gamari
2010-03-30 10:46 ` Pawel S
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100317093704.GA17146@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=bgamari.foss@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=madduck@madduck.net \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=olly@survex.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox