From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752868Ab0CRWzA (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Mar 2010 18:55:00 -0400 Received: from mga07.intel.com ([143.182.124.22]:35330 "EHLO azsmga101.ch.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752528Ab0CRWy6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Mar 2010 18:54:58 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.51,270,1267430400"; d="scan'208";a="256342665" Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:54:32 -0700 From: Sarah Sharp To: Greg KH Cc: Alex Chiang , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] small xhci cleanups Message-ID: <20100318225432.GA6166@xanatos> References: <20100316204845.GJ8278@ldl.fc.hp.com> <20100309184723.GA31374@kroah.com> <20100316212445.GA15729@xanatos> <20100316214014.GA8839@kroah.com> <20100318213308.GA5461@xanatos> <20100318221958.GB3299@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100318221958.GB3299@kroah.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 03:19:58PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 02:33:08PM -0700, Sarah Sharp wrote: > > Yes, I did par down the duplicate/redundant messages, but I still want > > to see very detailed messages when I think there's a hardware problem. > > > > What if I removed the debug config option for xHCI, allowed people to > > use dynamic debugging to enable debugging for specific xHCI files, but > > also allowed them to set the log level through a debugfs file? That way > > people could still control the variety of messages that they see, but > > they can also change the level of debugging dynamically. > > Sure, that might work, but I'd recommend tracing for the most part, > that's what it is there for :) Ok, I'll look into adding trace events. Sarah Sharp