From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753681Ab0CWE4m (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Mar 2010 00:56:42 -0400 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:44066 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751478Ab0CWE4l (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Mar 2010 00:56:41 -0400 Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 21:57:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20100322.215703.77339158.davem@davemloft.net> To: amwang@redhat.com Cc: mpm@selenic.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org, gospo@redhat.com, nhorman@tuxdriver.com, shemminger@linux-foundation.org, bonding-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, fubar@us.ibm.com Subject: Re: [RFC Patch 2/3] bridge: make bridge support netpoll From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <4BA84607.7030304@redhat.com> References: <4BA82186.3010204@redhat.com> <1269318470.3552.54.camel@calx> <4BA84607.7030304@redhat.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.3 on Emacs 23.1 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Cong Wang Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 12:39:35 +0800 > How could you let the bridge know netpoll is not sent to > the one that doesn't support netpoll during setup? This will > be complex, I am afraid. Why does this matter at all? I told you in another mail that we should do away with these callbacks and all the crazy 'npinfo' assignments and just do it in the generic code.