From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753948Ab0CVIAH (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Mar 2010 04:00:07 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:45673 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753359Ab0CVIAF (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Mar 2010 04:00:05 -0400 Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 00:58:59 -0400 From: Andrew Morton To: Marc Zyngier Cc: Eric Miao , LKML , Jebediah Huang Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: add interrupt handling capability to max732x Message-Id: <20100322005859.93268cfc.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20100322073946.5277f6ed@taxman.wild-wind.fr.eu.org> References: <4ed0c90d27185c38ccb15d6d4442cfd4@localhost> <20100319164156.87b6fc43.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20100322073946.5277f6ed@taxman.wild-wind.fr.eu.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.7.1 (GTK+ 2.18.7; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 07:39:46 +0000 Marc Zyngier wrote: > Would the following patch (against the original version) address your > concerns? Gee, I dunno. Is it necessary? I thought your earlier explanation covered everything OK. I wouldn't say I had concerns really - I just poke people to verify that problems didn't sneak through. If you think it improves the driver, sure, add it?