From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756513Ab0CVV0f (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Mar 2010 17:26:35 -0400 Received: from mail-ew0-f216.google.com ([209.85.219.216]:38434 "EHLO mail-ew0-f216.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756383Ab0CVV0d (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Mar 2010 17:26:33 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:message-id:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=L0rSalKiosDx8I+7UmYfkDi+j79fhA0FE1/NN0kxvBJ2Tc5nNAC934S3Jf+YaZ6rc5 u5OG42QwjpSXGUK1vagzcOPVIjpXCCkvds7Vg2vx05+/EZCp7UXP7IaittWU7b9tVPSm rU9qQmkKpJWrE/cTlXcMbOry1h2m1JSJa9Vcc= From: Dmitry Torokhov To: Jason Wessel Subject: Re: [RESEND] Re: [Kgdb-bugreport] [GIT PULL] V2 kdb / early debug (1 of 2) for 2.6.34 Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:26:25 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.1 (Linux/2.6.34-rc1; KDE/4.4.1; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Jesse Barnes , torvalds@linux-foundation.org, kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net, lkml References: <1267420188-10227-1-git-send-email-jason.wessel@windriver.com> <20100322130530.50e8de1e@jbarnes-piketon> <4BA7CF53.7040504@windriver.com> In-Reply-To: <4BA7CF53.7040504@windriver.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201003221426.25837.dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday 22 March 2010 01:13:07 pm Jason Wessel wrote: > On 03/22/2010 03:05 PM, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > On Sat, 20 Mar 2010 21:14:24 -0500 > > > > Jason Wessel wrote: > >> On 02/28/2010 11:09 PM, Jason Wessel wrote: > >>> Linus please pull the kdb-merge tree which merges the kdb front end > >>> into the kernel debug core for 7 architectures. > >>> > >>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jwessel/linux-2.6-kgdb.gi > >>> t kdb-merge > >> > >> What is the status of this pull request? Was some part of the process > >> missed here that there has been no response on this pull request? > >> > >> Please let me know what is wrong here. I have a number of other fixes > >> pending to the tree at this point. > >> > >> Would it be possible to merge part of the tree that is only related to > >> kgdb, in particular the directory re-organization? > > > > IIRC he still had some issues with the keyboard/input handling. We > > discussed it briefly a couple of weeks ago and he was worried about > > potential duplication. > > I worked with Dmitry Torokhov to come to some agreement with respect to > the kdb keyboard handling. This resulted in dropping one of the > keyboard patches entirely, and it will be done another way. There are > RFC patches from me on this, as well as Dmitry's own RFC patches for > sysrq handling. > > The discussion with Dmitry also resulted in the cleanup of the current > kdb low level PS/2 kdb keyboard driver to an acceptable state. I was > waiting to hear back on the response to the pull request before > investing further effort here. I am always open to suggestions of how > to solve this tricky problem. > Yep, as far as input concerned I am satisfied with Jason's changes so no need to block pull request on my account. -- Dmitry