From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756441Ab0CXO0I (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Mar 2010 10:26:08 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:51672 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756216Ab0CXO0G (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Mar 2010 10:26:06 -0400 Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 15:23:48 +0100 From: Oleg Nesterov To: Andrew Morton Cc: Alan Cox , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Roland McGrath , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH -mm] signals-clear-signal-tty-when-the-last-thread-exits.fix Message-ID: <20100324142348.GA8117@redhat.com> References: <20100319184020.GA519@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100319184020.GA519@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (fixup for signals-clear-signal-tty-when-the-last-thread-exits.patch) I didn't get this warning, but the old gcc complains kernel/exit.c: In function 'release_task': kernel/exit.c:85: warning: 'tty' may be used uninitialized in this function This clearly wrong, to the point it blames release_task() instead of __exit_signal(). But let's make compiler happy anyway, hopefully this is what it wants. Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov --- kernel/exit.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) --- 34-rc1/kernel/exit.c~FIX_EXIT_SIGNAL_TTY_WARNING 2010-03-21 18:36:44.000000000 +0100 +++ 34-rc1/kernel/exit.c 2010-03-24 14:59:55.000000000 +0100 @@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ static void __exit_signal(struct task_st struct signal_struct *sig = tsk->signal; bool group_dead = thread_group_leader(tsk); struct sighand_struct *sighand; - struct tty_struct *tty; + struct tty_struct *tty = NULL; /* supress gcc warning */ BUG_ON(!sig); BUG_ON(!atomic_read(&sig->count));