From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753485Ab0CZNXe (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Mar 2010 09:23:34 -0400 Received: from 1-1-12-13a.han.sth.bostream.se ([82.182.30.168]:33291 "EHLO palpatine.hardeman.nu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752906Ab0CZNXK (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Mar 2010 09:23:10 -0400 Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 12:04:15 +0100 From: David =?iso-8859-1?Q?H=E4rdeman?= To: Pavel Machek Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Jon Smirl , Dmitry Torokhov , Krzysztof Halasa , hermann pitton , Christoph Bartelmus , awalls@radix.net, j@jannau.net, jarod@redhat.com, jarod@wilsonet.com, kraxel@redhat.com, linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, superm1@ubuntu.com Subject: Re: [RFC] What are the goals for the architecture of an in-kernel IR system? Message-ID: <20100326110415.GA5387@hardeman.nu> Mail-Followup-To: Pavel Machek , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Jon Smirl , Dmitry Torokhov , Krzysztof Halasa , hermann pitton , Christoph Bartelmus , awalls@radix.net, j@jannau.net, jarod@redhat.com, jarod@wilsonet.com, kraxel@redhat.com, linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, superm1@ubuntu.com References: <4B279017.3080303@redhat.com> <20091215195859.GI24406@elf.ucw.cz> <9e4733910912151214n68161fc7tca0ffbf34c2c4e4@mail.gmail.com> <20091215201933.GK24406@elf.ucw.cz> <9e4733910912151229o371ee017tf3640d8f85728011@mail.gmail.com> <20091215203300.GL24406@elf.ucw.cz> <9e4733910912151245ne442a5dlcfee92609e364f70@mail.gmail.com> <9e4733910912151338n62b30af5i35f8d0963e6591c@mail.gmail.com> <4BAB7659.1040408@redhat.com> <20100325183259.GA22902@elf.ucw.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20100325183259.GA22902@elf.ucw.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 07:32:59PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > struct keycode_table_entry { > unsigned keycode; > int len; > char scancode[]; > } > > ? gcc extension, but commonly used around kernel. Flexible array members are ok in C99, aren't they? -- David Härdeman