From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754085Ab0CZVlH (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Mar 2010 17:41:07 -0400 Received: from mail-bw0-f209.google.com ([209.85.218.209]:48394 "EHLO mail-bw0-f209.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752338Ab0CZVlD (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Mar 2010 17:41:03 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=NT4ip7WQuv8ehW0JuXYFZCFmPdBWSFAhbzmDbg01cjiO7xVm3ak3XTB9tB60H45H8G F44ydWfx8YD2v+MY/k//abJC6O4Y+ekc6VoNPlVhzXKxObX0Iw8sXHZNWGuS/RkG4To6 ekz9KynRNDEjrU3rQAJ6v2om/nI0V+YcDZOjs= Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 22:41:02 +0100 From: Frederic Weisbecker To: Mike Galbraith Cc: Li Zefan , LKML , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Paul Mackerras Subject: Re: [BUG] perf: hard lockup when using perf-sched Message-ID: <20100326214101.GE7166@nowhere> References: <4BA9A885.9050105@cn.fujitsu.com> <1269415964.6530.25.camel@marge.simson.net> <1269418671.6465.6.camel@marge.simson.net> <4BAB1924.4060304@cn.fujitsu.com> <1269509241.8438.30.camel@marge.simson.net> <1269598293.6174.8.camel@marge.simson.net> <20100326172350.GC5188@nowhere> <1269630640.6331.18.camel@marge.simson.net> <20100326192712.GA7166@nowhere> <1269634924.6488.6.camel@marge.simson.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1269634924.6488.6.camel@marge.simson.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 09:22:04PM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote: > Hm. Last trace I took is below. > > ./forkbomb& Hmm, Yeah that's indeed what the traces show. And your patch really fix this on your box?