linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joel Becker <Joel.Becker@oracle.com>
To: Yury Polyanskiy <ypolyans@princeton.edu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>,
	Jan Glauber <jan.glauber@de.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hangcheck-timer is broken on x86
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 15:03:55 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100327220355.GA1810@mail.oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100326220259.702859e9@penta.localdomain>

On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 10:02:59PM -0400, Yury Polyanskiy wrote:
> Joel, just realized there is a slight mistake in what I said before.
> getrawmonotonic() is a refined jiffies (and actually resolves to
> get_cycles() on my system in the end). Thus it doesn't count while in
> suspend. However, jiffies-based timers (aka timer-wheel) are also
> stopped while in suspend. So getrawmonotonic() is the right call to
> check the precision of the jiffies-based timer (i.e. you dont need to
> make a correction by calling monotonic_to_bootbased()). 

	It's OK to tell hangcheck-timer users that suspend is not
allowed.  After all, you're running something that you don't want to see
hang.
	Is there a clock in the system that is a true wallclock?  I'm
guessing, since getrawmonotonic() is get_cycles() based, that it doesn't
provide accurate time in the face of cpufreq changes.  Is that true?

Joel



-- 

Life's Little Instruction Book #497

	"Go down swinging."

Joel Becker
Principal Software Developer
Oracle
E-mail: joel.becker@oracle.com
Phone: (650) 506-8127

  reply	other threads:[~2010-03-27 22:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-24  3:36 [PATCH] hangcheck-timer is broken on x86 Yury Polyanskiy
2010-03-26 21:24 ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-26 21:52   ` Yury Polyanskiy
2010-03-26 21:46 ` Joel Becker
2010-03-26 22:00   ` Yury Polyanskiy
2010-03-27  0:57     ` Joel Becker
2010-03-27  2:02       ` Yury Polyanskiy
2010-03-27 22:03         ` Joel Becker [this message]
2010-03-27 22:51           ` Yury Polyanskiy
2010-03-27 23:36             ` Joel Becker
2010-03-28  2:08               ` Yury Polyanskiy
2010-03-29  1:00   ` john stultz
2010-03-29 14:11     ` Yury Polyanskiy
2010-03-29 16:43       ` john stultz
2010-03-29 17:04         ` Yury Polyanskiy
2010-03-29 18:44           ` john stultz
2010-03-29 19:53             ` Joel Becker
2010-03-29 21:08             ` Yury Polyanskiy
2010-03-29 21:43               ` john stultz
2010-03-29 22:34                 ` Yury Polyanskiy
2010-04-08  0:52                   ` Joel Becker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100327220355.GA1810@mail.oracle.com \
    --to=joel.becker@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=jan.glauber@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ypolyans@princeton.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).