From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rcu: move some code from macro to function
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 21:15:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100328041554.GQ2343@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BAEC91E.8000001@cn.fujitsu.com>
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 11:12:30AM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
>
> cleanup: move some code from macro to function
Nice!
I have queued this for RCU 2.6.35, with the following commit message:
Shrink the RCU_INIT_FLAVOR() macro by moving all but the
initialization of the ->rda[] array to rcu_init_one().
The call to rcu_init_one() can then be moved to the end
of the RCU_INIT_FLAVOR() macro, which is required because
rcu_boot_init_percpu_data(), which is now called from
rcu_init_one(), depends on the initialization of the ->rda[]
array.
Seem reasonable?
Thanx, Paul
> Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
> index 3ec8160..112edb5 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcutree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
> @@ -1849,6 +1849,14 @@ static void __init rcu_init_one(struct rcu_state *rsp)
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rnp->blocked_tasks[3]);
> }
> }
> +
> + rnp = rsp->level[NUM_RCU_LVLS - 1];
> + for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
> + if (i > rnp->grphi)
> + rnp++;
> + rsp->rda[i]->mynode = rnp;
> + rcu_boot_init_percpu_data(i, rsp);
> + }
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -1859,19 +1867,11 @@ static void __init rcu_init_one(struct rcu_state *rsp)
> #define RCU_INIT_FLAVOR(rsp, rcu_data) \
> do { \
> int i; \
> - int j; \
> - struct rcu_node *rnp; \
> \
> - rcu_init_one(rsp); \
> - rnp = (rsp)->level[NUM_RCU_LVLS - 1]; \
> - j = 0; \
> for_each_possible_cpu(i) { \
> - if (i > rnp[j].grphi) \
> - j++; \
> - per_cpu(rcu_data, i).mynode = &rnp[j]; \
> (rsp)->rda[i] = &per_cpu(rcu_data, i); \
> - rcu_boot_init_percpu_data(i, rsp); \
> } \
> + rcu_init_one(rsp); \
> } while (0)
>
> void __init rcu_init(void)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-28 4:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-28 3:12 [PATCH] rcu: move some code from macro to function Lai Jiangshan
2010-03-28 4:15 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2010-03-29 1:03 ` Lai Jiangshan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100328041554.GQ2343@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox