From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com,
dipankar@in.ibm.com, josh@joshtriplett.org, dvhltc@us.ibm.com,
niv@us.ibm.com, peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, dhowells@redhat.com,
eric.dumazet@gmail.com, adobriyan@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [patch 0/6] rcu head debugobjects
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2010 20:45:13 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100329004513.GA32467@Krystal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1003280339590.3147@localhost.localdomain>
* Thomas Gleixner (tglx@linutronix.de) wrote:
> B1;2005;0cOn Sat, 27 Mar 2010, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >
> > o Patch 4/6 looks good to me, and given that Thomas hasn't
> > complained, I am guessing that he is OK with it.
>
> Looks sane at the first glance. Will go over it in detail tomorrow.
>
> > o Patch 6/6: Would it be possible to use the object_is_on_stack()
> > function defined in include/linux/sched.h instead of passing
> > in the flag on_stack to bdi_work_init()? It looks like
> > fs/fs-writeback.c already includes include/linux/sched.h, so
> > shouldn't be a problem from a #include-hell viewpoint.
>
> Well, I'm a bit wary about that. The reason is that we really want
> the annotation of:
>
> init_on_stack();
> ....
> destroy_on_stack();
>
> instead of the confusing:
>
> init();
> ....
> destroy_on_stack();
>
> So having an automatism in the bdi_work_init() function will people
> make forget to put the destroy_on_stack() annotation into it.
>
> The flag is horrible as well. How about this:
>
> /* helper function, do not use in code ! */
> __bdi_work_init(....., onstack)
> {
> ....
> if (on_stack) {
> work.state |= WS_ONSTACK;
> init_rcu_head_on_stack(&work.rcu_head);
> } else {
> ....
> }
>
> See, how this moves also the "work.state |= WS_ONSTACK;" line out of
> the calling code.
>
> bdi_work_init(...)
> {
> __bdi_work_init(...., false);
> }
>
> bdi_work_init_on_stack(...)
> {
> __bdi_work_init(...., true);
> }
>
>
> out of the code.
>
> To make it complete, please do not use the asymmetric:
>
> destroy_rcu_head_on_stack(&work.rcu_head);
>
> Create a helper function:
>
> bdi_destroy_work_on_stack(...)
> {
> destroy_rcu_head_on_stack(work->rcu_head);
> }
>
> That makes it way more readable and we did that with the other on
> stack initializers as well.
These changes are queued for v3. Thanks Thomas!
Mathieu
>
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-29 0:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-27 15:32 [patch 0/6] rcu head debugobjects Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-03-27 15:32 ` [patch 1/6] commit 501fdb3aeeb2444f86d289a4a044cf7c8fbc17df Author: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca> Date: Sat Mar 27 10:52:11 2010 -0400 Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-03-27 15:32 ` [patch 2/6] commit afd066d60b77e28651bb8323fc8cfcedacc5cbf8 Author: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca> Date: Sat Mar 27 10:53:30 " Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-03-27 15:32 ` [patch 3/6] commit 418b6f2c2ddba7c91d1186b68618092910260c32 Author: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca> Date: Sat Mar 27 11:05:38 " Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-03-27 15:32 ` [patch 4/6] Debugobjects transition check Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-03-27 15:32 ` [patch 5/6] tree/tiny rcu: Add debug RCU head objects (v4) Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-03-27 15:32 ` [patch 6/6] kernel call_rcu usage: initialize rcu_head structures (v2) Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-03-27 15:40 ` [patch 0/6] rcu head debugobjects David Miller
2010-03-27 22:46 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-03-27 23:14 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-03-27 23:20 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-03-27 23:43 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-03-28 0:02 ` [RFC patch] extable and module add object is static Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-03-28 0:25 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-03-29 1:39 ` Lai Jiangshan
2010-03-29 3:18 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-03-29 8:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-29 13:16 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-03-29 13:55 ` Tejun Heo
2010-03-29 14:03 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-03-29 13:39 ` [patch 0/6] rcu head debugobjects Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-03-29 14:53 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-03-29 15:04 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-03-29 16:01 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-03-28 2:07 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-03-28 4:30 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-03-29 0:45 ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100329004513.GA32467@Krystal \
--to=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=dvhltc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox