From: Yury Polyanskiy <ypolyans@princeton.edu>
To: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Joel Becker <Joel.Becker@oracle.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Jan Glauber <jan.glauber@de.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hangcheck-timer is broken on x86
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 10:11:06 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100329101106.3678a312@penta.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1269824436.1880.2.camel@work-vm>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 930 bytes --]
On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 18:00:36 -0700
john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> > 1) Does getrawmonotonic() satisfy hangcheck-timer? What I mean is, will
> > it always return the wallclock nanoseconds even in the face of CPU speed
> > changes, suspend, udelay, or any other suspension of kernel operation?
> > Yes, I know this is a tougher standard than rdtsc(), but this is what
> > hangcheck-timer wants. rdtsc() at least satisfied udelay and PCI hangs.
>
> getrawmonotonic() can be stalled and will wrap on some hardware (acpi pm
> timer wraps every 5 seconds).
>
I am not sure which archs do you mean. But in any case,
getrawmonotonic() is not just a wrap around a call to rdtsc() (or acpi
pm timer read). It is based on the clock->raw_time, which is updated
every timer interrupt by the update_wall_time(). So even if underlying
timer wraps, it doesn't lead to getrawmonotonic() returning 0 sec.
Y
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-29 14:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-24 3:36 [PATCH] hangcheck-timer is broken on x86 Yury Polyanskiy
2010-03-26 21:24 ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-26 21:52 ` Yury Polyanskiy
2010-03-26 21:46 ` Joel Becker
2010-03-26 22:00 ` Yury Polyanskiy
2010-03-27 0:57 ` Joel Becker
2010-03-27 2:02 ` Yury Polyanskiy
2010-03-27 22:03 ` Joel Becker
2010-03-27 22:51 ` Yury Polyanskiy
2010-03-27 23:36 ` Joel Becker
2010-03-28 2:08 ` Yury Polyanskiy
2010-03-29 1:00 ` john stultz
2010-03-29 14:11 ` Yury Polyanskiy [this message]
2010-03-29 16:43 ` john stultz
2010-03-29 17:04 ` Yury Polyanskiy
2010-03-29 18:44 ` john stultz
2010-03-29 19:53 ` Joel Becker
2010-03-29 21:08 ` Yury Polyanskiy
2010-03-29 21:43 ` john stultz
2010-03-29 22:34 ` Yury Polyanskiy
2010-04-08 0:52 ` Joel Becker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100329101106.3678a312@penta.localdomain \
--to=ypolyans@princeton.edu \
--cc=Joel.Becker@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=jan.glauber@de.ibm.com \
--cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox