Re: [watchdog] combine nmi_watchdog and softlockup

[Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>]

On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 10:46:50PM -0400, Aristeu Sergio Rozanski Filho wrote:
> Hi Don,
> > +/* deprecated */
> > +static int __init nosoftlockup_setup(char *str)
> > +{
> > +	no_watchdog = 1;
> > +	return 1;
> > +}
> > +__setup("nosoftlockup", nosoftlockup_setup);
> > +static int __init nonmi_watchdog_setup(char *str)
> > +{
> > +	no_watchdog = 1;
> > +	return 1;
> > +}
> > +__setup("nonmi_watchdog", nonmi_watchdog_setup);
> didn't you just add nonmi_watchdog parameter? I don't think there's a reason
> to keep compatibility here.

Hmm, I think you are right.  I thought I added that because it existed in
the old nmi_watchdog setup but I can't find it.  So yeah, I can drop that.

Thanks,
Don