From: Joel Becker <Joel.Becker@oracle.com>
To: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Yury Polyanskiy <ypolyans@princeton.edu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Jan Glauber <jan.glauber@de.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hangcheck-timer is broken on x86
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 12:53:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100329195320.GA12499@mail.oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1269888291.3968.5.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 11:44:51AM -0700, john stultz wrote:
> > But if timer interrupt is delayed by more than acpi_pm wrap-around
> > time, then the update_wall_time() is also screwed. Since it is not, we
> > can rely on getrawmonotonic().
>
> Right, if the box hangs for longer then the clocksource can count for,
> the timekeeping subsystem will be off by some multiple of that length.
>
> And That's exactly why I'm advising against using
> gettimeofday/getrawmonotonic or any other software managed sense of time
> for the hangcheck timer, as you won't be able to correctly detect hangs.
>
> I'm also suggesting using something like read_persistent_clock() is
> better, because there is no OS/software management involved (other then
> the minor syncing issue I mentioned before) so if the system hangs for a
> long period of time, then returns, you'll still be able to detect the
> hang.
>
> But maybe what folks are using the hangcheck timer for is shifting, so
> its possible that I'm not quite understanding what you're trying to do
> here.
The people who use hangcheck-timer for the reasons I originally
wrote it absolutely want any hang, including long ones, detected.
Joel
--
"For every complex problem there exists a solution that is brief,
concise, and totally wrong."
-Unknown
Joel Becker
Principal Software Developer
Oracle
E-mail: joel.becker@oracle.com
Phone: (650) 506-8127
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-29 19:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-24 3:36 [PATCH] hangcheck-timer is broken on x86 Yury Polyanskiy
2010-03-26 21:24 ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-26 21:52 ` Yury Polyanskiy
2010-03-26 21:46 ` Joel Becker
2010-03-26 22:00 ` Yury Polyanskiy
2010-03-27 0:57 ` Joel Becker
2010-03-27 2:02 ` Yury Polyanskiy
2010-03-27 22:03 ` Joel Becker
2010-03-27 22:51 ` Yury Polyanskiy
2010-03-27 23:36 ` Joel Becker
2010-03-28 2:08 ` Yury Polyanskiy
2010-03-29 1:00 ` john stultz
2010-03-29 14:11 ` Yury Polyanskiy
2010-03-29 16:43 ` john stultz
2010-03-29 17:04 ` Yury Polyanskiy
2010-03-29 18:44 ` john stultz
2010-03-29 19:53 ` Joel Becker [this message]
2010-03-29 21:08 ` Yury Polyanskiy
2010-03-29 21:43 ` john stultz
2010-03-29 22:34 ` Yury Polyanskiy
2010-04-08 0:52 ` Joel Becker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100329195320.GA12499@mail.oracle.com \
--to=joel.becker@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=jan.glauber@de.ibm.com \
--cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ypolyans@princeton.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).