From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753546Ab0C2VHA (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Mar 2010 17:07:00 -0400 Received: from kroah.org ([198.145.64.141]:37743 "EHLO coco.kroah.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752192Ab0C2VG7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Mar 2010 17:06:59 -0400 Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 14:07:22 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Mathieu Desnoyers Cc: Steven Rostedt , Randy Dunlap , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Peter Zijlstra , stable , Rusty Russell , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet , Tejun Heo , Ingo Molnar , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [stable] [PATCH 2.6.29.x - 2.6.31.1] module: fix __module_ref_addr() Message-ID: <20100329210722.GA14993@kroah.com> References: <20100327143126.GA25615@Krystal> <1269890492.19685.4767.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <20100329200946.GA1618@Krystal> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100329200946.GA1618@Krystal> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 04:09:46PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > * Steven Rostedt (rostedt@goodmis.org) wrote: > > This patch does not apply to 2.6.34-rc, and the code in upstream looks > > to have been fixed. Should this go to stable? > > Yes. 2.6.34-rc does not have this issue anymore, but the patch is needed in > -stable. Why is this not in .34-rc2? Can you find the specific patch in Linus's tree that solves this and let stable@kernel.org know about it? thanks, greg k-h