Re: [PATCH v6 0/8] hid: new driver for PicoLCD device

Jiri Kosina
2010-03-31T09:28:36Z

On Tue, 30 Mar 2010, Bruno Prémont wrote:

> > so please either remove the parts that depend on power management for
> > now, or I'll wait on your respin of the generic HID-PM patch.
>
> Here I respin the whole series, with PM moved to patch n°8 and
> patch n°7 being my original generic HID-PM.

Thanks!

> Without the PM part there is one compiler warning about defined but
> unused function (picolcd_resume_backlight), I hope this is not an issue.
> If it is that function can move over to the PM patch (with it's stub for
> !CONFIG_BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE case)

It's actually picolcd_suspend_backlight(), the resume function is called
from debugfs-triggered reset write.

I have removed it from the patch for now, it should better be added when
being used (i.e. when the proper PM support goes in as well).

> So for now you can skip the last two patches during merge.

I have applied patches 1-6 to my tree. So please base any further
additions to the driver on the version that's in my tree now (picolcd and
for-next branches).

> Do you have any suggestions regarding generic HID-PM as to how much
> and how it should be visible to the HID driver?

I will look into the patch you have sent and comment on that shortly
separately.

Thanks,

--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.