From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755281Ab0C3DEl (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Mar 2010 23:04:41 -0400 Received: from mail.openrapids.net ([64.15.138.104]:33936 "EHLO blackscsi.openrapids.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750899Ab0C3DEk (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Mar 2010 23:04:40 -0400 Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 23:04:38 -0400 From: Mathieu Desnoyers To: Tejun Heo Cc: Greg KH , Steven Rostedt , Randy Dunlap , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Peter Zijlstra , stable , Rusty Russell , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet , Ingo Molnar , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [stable] [PATCH 2.6.29.x - 2.6.31.1] module: fix __module_ref_addr() Message-ID: <20100330030438.GA7683@Krystal> References: <20100327143126.GA25615@Krystal> <1269890492.19685.4767.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <20100329200946.GA1618@Krystal> <20100329210722.GA14993@kroah.com> <4BB15E1E.70504@kernel.org> <4BB16339.8090602@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4BB16339.8090602@kernel.org> X-Editor: vi X-Info: http://www.efficios.com X-Operating-System: Linux/2.6.26-2-686 (i686) X-Uptime: 23:02:59 up 66 days, 5:40, 4 users, load average: 0.01, 0.04, 0.01 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Tejun Heo (tj@kernel.org) wrote: > On 03/30/2010 11:12 AM, Tejun Heo wrote: > > Hello, Greg. > > > > On 03/30/2010 06:07 AM, Greg KH wrote: > >>> Yes. 2.6.34-rc does not have this issue anymore, but the patch is needed in > >>> -stable. > >> > >> Why is this not in .34-rc2? Can you find the specific patch in Linus's > >> tree that solves this and let stable@kernel.org know about it? > > > > For 2.6.34, the following two patches should remove the problem. > > They're not in mainline yet but should appear in linux-next soon and > > after a few days, I'll push them to Linus. > > > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/958794/focus=959493 > > Oh, Steven is right. The ones which are removed by the above patch > are different ones. That said, it might be a good idea to apply fixes > for them to -stable too. Mathieu, are you interested in submitting > similar -stable fixes for kernel/module.c::percpu_modcopy() and > lockdep.c::static_obj()? Sure, will do. I'm doing a bit of testing and I'll post these patches shortly. Thanks, Mathieu > > Thanks. > > -- > tejun -- Mathieu Desnoyers Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant EfficiOS Inc. http://www.efficios.com