public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@amd64.org>
Cc: davej@redhat.com, trenn@suse.de, linux@dominikbrodowski.net,
	<mingo@elte.hu>, <hpa@zytor.com>, <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, <x86@kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [-v2 PATCH 2/6] powernow-k8: Add core performance boost support
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 15:42:29 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100330154229.dc8ebd24.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1269610800-23847-3-git-send-email-bp@amd64.org>

On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 14:39:56 +0100
Borislav Petkov <bp@amd64.org> wrote:

> From: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
> 
> Starting with F10h, revE, AMD processors add support for a dynamic
> core boosting feature called Core Performance Boost. When a specific
> condition is present, a subset of the cores on a system are boosted
> beyond their P0 operating frequency to speed up the performance of
> single-threaded applications.
> 
> In the normal case, the system comes out of reset with core boosting
> enabled. This patch adds a sysfs knob with which core boosting can be
> switched on or off for benchmarking purposes.
> 
> While at it, cleanup the driver init codepath and update copyrights.
> 
> ...
>
> +static void _cpb_toggle_msrs(bool t)
> +{
> +	int cpu;
> +
> +	rdmsr_on_cpus(cpu_online_mask, MSR_K7_HWCR, msrs);
> +
> +	for_each_cpu(cpu, cpu_online_mask) {
> +		struct msr *reg = per_cpu_ptr(msrs, cpu);
> +		if (t)
> +			reg->l &= ~BIT(25);
> +		else
> +			reg->l |= BIT(25);
> +	}
> +	wrmsr_on_cpus(cpu_online_mask, MSR_K7_HWCR, msrs);
> +}

What prevents cpu_online_mask from changing while this is happening?

> @@ -1422,15 +1490,34 @@ static int __cpuinit powernowk8_init(void)
>  			supported_cpus++;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (supported_cpus == num_online_cpus()) {
> -		printk(KERN_INFO PFX "Found %d %s "
> -			"processors (%d cpu cores) (" VERSION ")\n",
> -			num_online_nodes(),
> -			boot_cpu_data.x86_model_id, supported_cpus);
> -		return cpufreq_register_driver(&cpufreq_amd64_driver);
> +	if (supported_cpus != num_online_cpus())
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
> +	printk(KERN_INFO PFX "Found %d %s (%d cpu cores) (" VERSION ")\n",
> +		num_online_nodes(), boot_cpu_data.x86_model_id, supported_cpus);
> +
> +	if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CPB)) {
> +
> +		cpb_capable = true;
> +
> +		msrs = msrs_alloc();
> +		if (!msrs) {
> +			printk(KERN_ERR "%s: Error allocating msrs!\n", __func__);
> +			return -ENOMEM;
> +		}
> +
> +		rdmsr_on_cpus(cpu_online_mask, MSR_K7_HWCR, msrs);
> +
> +		for_each_cpu(cpu, cpu_online_mask) {
> +			struct msr *reg = per_cpu_ptr(msrs, cpu);
> +			cpb_enabled |= !(!!(reg->l & BIT(25)));
> +		}

Ditto.

I assume these changes get applied to new CPUs as they come online?

> ...

  reply	other threads:[~2010-03-30 22:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-26 13:39 [-v2 PATCH 0/6] powernow-k8: Core Performance Boost and effective frequency support Borislav Petkov
2010-03-26 13:39 ` [-v2 PATCH 1/6] x86, cpu: Add AMD core boosting feature flag to /proc/cpuinfo Borislav Petkov
2010-03-26 13:39 ` [-v2 PATCH 2/6] powernow-k8: Add core performance boost support Borislav Petkov
2010-03-30 22:42   ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2010-03-31  6:13     ` Borislav Petkov
2010-03-31  3:22       ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-31  6:35         ` Borislav Petkov
2010-03-31  3:38           ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-31  6:42             ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-03-31 15:08               ` Borislav Petkov
2010-03-31 15:16                 ` Dave Jones
2010-04-09 20:57                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-04-09 20:59                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-04-08  9:48               ` Borislav Petkov
2010-03-26 13:39 ` [-v2 PATCH 3/6] x86: Unify APERF/MPERF support Borislav Petkov
2010-03-26 13:39 ` [-v2 PATCH 4/6] cpufreq: Add APERF/MPERF support for AMD processors Borislav Petkov
2010-03-26 13:39 ` [-v2 PATCH 5/6] powernow-k8: Fix frequency reporting Borislav Petkov
2010-03-26 13:40 ` [-v2 PATCH 6/6] cpufreq: Unify sysfs attribute definition macros Borislav Petkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100330154229.dc8ebd24.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bp@amd64.org \
    --cc=cpufreq@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=davej@redhat.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@dominikbrodowski.net \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=trenn@suse.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox