From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756822Ab0CaPSh (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Mar 2010 11:18:37 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:54825 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756161Ab0CaPSf (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Mar 2010 11:18:35 -0400 Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 11:16:20 -0400 From: Dave Jones To: Borislav Petkov Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" , Andrew Morton , trenn@suse.de, linux@dominikbrodowski.net, mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [-v2 PATCH 2/6] powernow-k8: Add core performance boost support Message-ID: <20100331151620.GA1893@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , Borislav Petkov , "H. Peter Anvin" , Andrew Morton , trenn@suse.de, linux@dominikbrodowski.net, mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <1269610800-23847-1-git-send-email-bp@amd64.org> <1269610800-23847-3-git-send-email-bp@amd64.org> <20100330154229.dc8ebd24.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20100331061343.GA28659@aftab> <20100330232221.826fe933.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20100331063546.GB28659@aftab> <20100330233851.17370621.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <4BB2EEE1.4010904@zytor.com> <20100331150854.GC30028@aftab> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100331150854.GC30028@aftab> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 05:08:54PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > From: "H. Peter Anvin" > Date: Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 11:42:41PM -0700 > > > On 03/30/2010 08:38 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > > > I've unilaterally decided that all six patches should be merged via the > > > x86 tree, btw. They could be split between x86 and cpufreq, but I > > > suspect there are interdependencies which would make that hard. > > > > > > > I would agree with that. I'll try to get them in tomorrow. > > Cool. I'll have updated versions of the patches soon - just don't take > those yet. fine, I'll drop these from the cpufreq git tree later. Dave