From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932820Ab0CaRav (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Mar 2010 13:30:51 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:39334 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932790Ab0CaRau (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Mar 2010 13:30:50 -0400 Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 10:30:49 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Pavan Savoy Cc: Marcel Holtmann , alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers:staging: sources for ST core Message-ID: <20100331173049.GD8906@suse.de> References: <999484.97147.qm@web94908.mail.in2.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <999484.97147.qm@web94908.mail.in2.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 04:20:22AM +0530, Pavan Savoy wrote: > > --- On Wed, 31/3/10, Pavan Savoy wrote: > > > From: Pavan Savoy > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers:staging: sources for ST core > > To: gregkh@suse.de > > Cc: "Marcel Holtmann" , alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk > > Date: Wednesday, 31 March, 2010, 4:11 AM > > --- On Wed, 31/3/10, Pavan Savoy > > > > wrote: > > > > > From: Pavan Savoy > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers:staging: sources for ST > > core > > > To: "pavan_savoy@yahoo.co.in" > > > > > Date: Wednesday, 31 March, 2010, 4:06 AM > > > > From: Greg KH [gregkh@suse.de] > > > > Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2010 3:17 AM > > > > To: Savoy, Pavan > > > > Cc: Alan Cox; marcel@holtmann.org; > > > > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers:staging: sources for > > ST > > > core > > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 02:35:55AM +0530, Pavan > > Savoy > > > > wrote: > > > > > So, something like the below is ok, I have > > > defined my > > > > own pr_fmt, > > > > > however default log level on my board is 7, > > and > > > hence > > > > pr_info is a bit > > > > > more annoying than usual. > > > > > > > > No, a driver should use dev_dbg() and other > > > dev_printk() > > > > calls, not > > > > pr_debug() or anything like that. > > > > > > > > Please don't roll your own formats, use the ones > > that > > > are > > > > well defined > > > > and uniquely describe your driver and device in > > a > > > format > > > > that the whole > > > > kernel uses. > > > > > > > forgot lkml the last time.. > > Nope, I couldn't find any instance of struct device at all, > I need that to use dev_dbg right ? - None of the tty_* > structure accessible by ldiscs seems to have a reference to > it. > Also I happened to look at other line discipline driver, if > they have a smarter way of doing this, Nope - n_tty, n_hdlc, > n_slip all seem to use plain old printks. > > Any clues ?? Sorry, you are correct, we only have a struct kref right now for tty core objects, not a struct device. So nevermind, this should be fine. thanks, greg k-h