From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, airlied@linux.ie,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Subject: Re: Config NO_BOOTMEM breaks my amd64 box
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 01:02:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100331230237.GA31279@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.00.1004010952080.31957@tundra.namei.org>
* James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Mar 2010, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> > >
> > > Yes, it was happening with -rc3.
> >
> > Could you please send the bootlog that Yinghai asked for, plus also one that
> > you get with NO_BOOTMEM turned off (for comparison)?
>
> I don't have the old boot logs, and have since upgraded the system
> further.
Please, could you send any bootlog then that we could work from? That way we
could check the memory layout and guess the rough shape of the early
allocations, etc.
> IIRC, the boot was failing after not being able to find the root fs
> (ext3/lvm/raid0). I thought it was a dracut issue, but it seemed to be
> fixed by enabling bootmem.
Ok - initrd unpack failing or initial mount failing is consistent with the
initrd getting corrupted by overlapping early reservations due to allocator
bug.
> > Also, when did you first hit this bug? This code has been upstream for
> > almost a month, and it was in linux-next before that - so you should have
> > hit this much sooner. A rough timeframe would suffice. I suppose you were
> > booting upstream kernels during the merge window as well?
>
> In this case, in the last few days (also when I first saw or noticed the
> bootmem option). I was booting relatively recent linus kernels during the
> merge window, although my main work was being done on an older upstream
> kernel.
Ok, so it's not an old regression but possibly a bug in one of the fixes. Not
good.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-31 23:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-31 4:49 Config NO_BOOTMEM breaks my amd64 box James Morris
2010-03-31 6:26 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-03-31 6:47 ` James Morris
2010-03-31 16:25 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-31 18:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-03-31 20:57 ` Dave Airlie
2010-03-31 21:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-03-31 21:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-03-31 21:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-03-31 21:14 ` Dave Airlie
2010-03-31 22:02 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-31 22:28 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-03-31 22:58 ` James Morris
2010-03-31 23:02 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2010-03-31 23:35 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-03-31 23:43 ` James Morris
2010-03-31 23:48 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-04-01 1:00 ` James Morris
2010-04-01 12:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-04-08 6:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-04-08 7:00 ` Yinghai
2010-04-08 7:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-04-09 2:43 ` Dave Airlie
2010-04-08 8:05 ` James Morris
2010-04-08 8:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-03-31 22:05 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-31 22:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-03-31 22:16 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-31 22:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-03-31 22:47 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-31 22:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-04-01 0:01 ` Johannes Weiner
2010-03-31 23:34 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-03-31 23:54 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-04-01 0:35 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-04-01 1:07 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-04-01 2:02 ` [PATCH -v3] nobootmem/bootmem, x86: Fix 32bit numa system without RAM on Node0 Yinghai Lu
2010-04-01 3:18 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-04-01 3:30 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-04-01 3:44 ` [PATCH -v4 1/2] nobootmem, " Yinghai Lu
2010-04-01 3:45 ` [PATCH -v4 2/2] bootmem, " Yinghai Lu
2010-04-01 22:57 ` [tip:x86/urgent] bootmem, x86: Fix 32bit numa system without RAM on node 0 tip-bot for Yinghai Lu
2010-04-01 22:57 ` [tip:x86/urgent] nobootmem, " tip-bot for Yinghai Lu
2010-03-31 10:51 ` Config NO_BOOTMEM breaks my amd64 box Stefan Richter
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-04-01 3:16 H. Peter Anvin
2010-04-01 3:35 ` Yinghai Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100331230237.GA31279@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).