linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, airlied@linux.ie,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Subject: Re: Config NO_BOOTMEM breaks my amd64 box
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 01:02:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100331230237.GA31279@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.00.1004010952080.31957@tundra.namei.org>


* James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> wrote:

> On Wed, 31 Mar 2010, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> > > 
> > > Yes, it was happening with -rc3.
> > 
> > Could you please send the bootlog that Yinghai asked for, plus also one that 
> > you get with NO_BOOTMEM turned off (for comparison)?
> 
> I don't have the old boot logs, and have since upgraded the system 
> further.  

Please, could you send any bootlog then that we could work from? That way we 
could check the memory layout and guess the rough shape of the early 
allocations, etc.

> IIRC, the boot was failing after not being able to find the root fs 
> (ext3/lvm/raid0).  I thought it was a dracut issue, but it seemed to be 
> fixed by enabling bootmem.

Ok - initrd unpack failing or initial mount failing is consistent with the 
initrd getting corrupted by overlapping early reservations due to allocator 
bug.

> > Also, when did you first hit this bug? This code has been upstream for 
> > almost a month, and it was in linux-next before that - so you should have 
> > hit this much sooner. A rough timeframe would suffice. I suppose you were 
> > booting upstream kernels during the merge window as well?
> 
> In this case, in the last few days (also when I first saw or noticed the 
> bootmem option).  I was booting relatively recent linus kernels during the 
> merge window, although my main work was being done on an older upstream 
> kernel.

Ok, so it's not an old regression but possibly a bug in one of the fixes. Not 
good.

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2010-03-31 23:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-31  4:49 Config NO_BOOTMEM breaks my amd64 box James Morris
2010-03-31  6:26 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-03-31  6:47   ` James Morris
2010-03-31 16:25     ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-31 18:59     ` Ingo Molnar
2010-03-31 20:57       ` Dave Airlie
2010-03-31 21:02         ` Linus Torvalds
2010-03-31 21:40           ` Ingo Molnar
2010-03-31 21:47         ` Ingo Molnar
2010-03-31 21:14       ` Dave Airlie
2010-03-31 22:02         ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-31 22:28         ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-03-31 22:58       ` James Morris
2010-03-31 23:02         ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2010-03-31 23:35         ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-03-31 23:43           ` James Morris
2010-03-31 23:48             ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-04-01  1:00               ` James Morris
2010-04-01 12:52                 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-04-08  6:32                   ` Ingo Molnar
2010-04-08  7:00                     ` Yinghai
2010-04-08  7:27                       ` Ingo Molnar
2010-04-09  2:43                         ` Dave Airlie
2010-04-08  8:05                     ` James Morris
2010-04-08  8:22                       ` Ingo Molnar
2010-03-31 22:05     ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-31 22:13       ` Ingo Molnar
2010-03-31 22:16         ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-31 22:41           ` Ingo Molnar
2010-03-31 22:47             ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-31 22:56               ` Ingo Molnar
2010-04-01  0:01                 ` Johannes Weiner
2010-03-31 23:34               ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-03-31 23:54                 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-04-01  0:35                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-04-01  1:07                     ` Yinghai Lu
2010-04-01  2:02                     ` [PATCH -v3] nobootmem/bootmem, x86: Fix 32bit numa system without RAM on Node0 Yinghai Lu
2010-04-01  3:18                       ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-04-01  3:30                         ` Yinghai Lu
2010-04-01  3:44                         ` [PATCH -v4 1/2] nobootmem, " Yinghai Lu
2010-04-01  3:45                           ` [PATCH -v4 2/2] bootmem, " Yinghai Lu
2010-04-01 22:57                             ` [tip:x86/urgent] bootmem, x86: Fix 32bit numa system without RAM on node 0 tip-bot for Yinghai Lu
2010-04-01 22:57                           ` [tip:x86/urgent] nobootmem, " tip-bot for Yinghai Lu
2010-03-31 10:51 ` Config NO_BOOTMEM breaks my amd64 box Stefan Richter
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-04-01  3:16 H. Peter Anvin
2010-04-01  3:35 ` Yinghai Lu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100331230237.GA31279@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).