From: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
To: Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@redhat.com>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
hbabu@us.ibm.com, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/amd-iommu: enable iommu before attaching devices
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 11:11:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100402091118.GM24846@8bytes.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100402012353.GY29241@sequoia.sous-sol.org>
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 06:23:53PM -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
> Hit another kdump problem as reported by Neil Horman. When initializaing
> the IOMMU, we attach devices to their domains before the IOMMU is
> fully (re)initialized. Attaching a device will issue some important
> invalidations. In the context of the newly kexec'd kdump kernel, the
> IOMMU may have stale cached data from the original kernel. Because we
> do the attach too early, the invalidation commands are placed in the new
> command buffer before the IOMMU is updated w/ that buffer. This leaves
> the stale entries in the kdump context and can renders device unusable.
> Simply enable the IOMMU before we do the attach.
>
> Cc: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
> Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/amd_iommu_init.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/amd_iommu_init.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/amd_iommu_init.c
> @@ -1288,6 +1288,8 @@ static int __init amd_iommu_init(void)
> if (ret)
> goto free;
>
> + enable_iommus();
> +
> if (iommu_pass_through)
> ret = amd_iommu_init_passthrough();
> else
> @@ -1300,8 +1302,6 @@ static int __init amd_iommu_init(void)
>
> amd_iommu_init_notifier();
>
> - enable_iommus();
> -
> if (iommu_pass_through)
> goto out;
Ok, good to know this fixes the problem. One issue: If the
initialization of the domains fails the iommu hardware needs to be
disabled again in the free path.
Thanks,
Joerg
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-02 9:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-31 15:24 [PATCH] amd iommu: force flush of iommu prior during shutdown Neil Horman
2010-03-31 15:54 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-03-31 18:28 ` Neil Horman
2010-03-31 18:57 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-03-31 19:18 ` Neil Horman
2010-03-31 19:51 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-03-31 20:27 ` Neil Horman
2010-04-01 4:04 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-04-01 12:49 ` Neil Horman
2010-04-01 14:29 ` Joerg Roedel
2010-04-01 14:47 ` Neil Horman
2010-04-01 15:56 ` Joerg Roedel
2010-04-01 17:11 ` Neil Horman
2010-04-01 20:14 ` Joerg Roedel
2010-04-02 0:00 ` Neil Horman
2010-04-02 0:30 ` Chris Wright
2010-04-02 1:23 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86/amd-iommu: enable iommu before attaching devices Chris Wright
2010-04-02 1:31 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86/amd-iommu: warn when issuing command to uninitiailed cmd buffer Chris Wright
2010-04-02 1:35 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86/amd-iommu: enable iommu before attaching devices Neil Horman
2010-04-02 1:38 ` Chris Wright
2010-04-02 9:11 ` Joerg Roedel [this message]
2010-04-02 23:59 ` Chris Wright
2010-04-02 15:59 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-04-02 22:38 ` Chris Wright
2010-04-02 22:55 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-04-02 23:57 ` Chris Wright
2010-04-03 17:38 ` Joerg Roedel
2010-04-05 14:17 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-04-05 14:32 ` Joerg Roedel
2010-04-05 15:34 ` Neil Horman
2010-03-31 18:43 ` [PATCH] amd iommu: force flush of iommu prior during shutdown Eric W. Biederman
2010-03-31 21:25 ` Chris Wright
2010-04-01 1:13 ` Neil Horman
2010-04-01 1:39 ` Chris Wright
2010-04-01 2:24 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-04-01 12:53 ` Neil Horman
2010-04-01 15:02 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-04-01 15:13 ` Neil Horman
2010-04-01 2:44 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-04-01 7:10 ` Chris Wright
2010-04-01 12:56 ` Neil Horman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100402091118.GM24846@8bytes.org \
--to=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=hbabu@us.ibm.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=joerg.roedel@amd.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nhorman@redhat.com \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox