From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751417Ab0DEG5Q (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Apr 2010 02:57:16 -0400 Received: from mail-bw0-f209.google.com ([209.85.218.209]:35937 "EHLO mail-bw0-f209.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750994Ab0DEG5M (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Apr 2010 02:57:12 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=MnnRckGo+tX0NJ6xUx3tjXMobMpGJZRyL3iklRZPhkv2vv1fuxqF1ya6w4aPJJ6gt4 uTC5XOf6MfBi5abKp48c7BtIGhKWIfFTWUimILbddGMPRw7mHJS7X1E2GuiXpY9en+4q zPbOVAQ+2TNGvgQgZ68xntriZqhBgCmtYRVyc= Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 08:57:04 +0200 From: Frederic Weisbecker To: David Miller Cc: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, acme@redhat.com, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, paulus@samba.org Subject: Re: Random scheduler/unaligned accesses crashes with perf lock events on sparc 64 Message-ID: <20100405065701.GC5127@nowhere> References: <20100404121851.GC5177@nowhere> <20100404122113.GD5177@nowhere> <20100404.180057.109331958.davem@davemloft.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100404.180057.109331958.davem@davemloft.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Apr 04, 2010 at 06:00:57PM -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: Frederic Weisbecker > Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2010 14:21:19 +0200 > > > Forgot the config, it's in attachment. > > I get them too when even trying to use the function tracer in some > simple way. They occur in random places and eventually the entire > machine wedges and is unusuable. Yeah. But it's not totally random. I often see the same scheduler crash. It seems to happen after an unaligned access fixup. > > I suspect there is some bug that ends up corrupting memory, so I > started trying to debug this last night when I first saw it. Ok. I indeed have the same problem with the function tracer when it is running. > I'll let you know if I make any progress. Thanks!