From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lockdep: Make lockstats counting per cpu
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 11:25:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100406092544.GB5147@nowhere> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1270543587.1597.742.camel@laptop>
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 10:46:27AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 00:10 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > Locking statistics are implemented using global atomic variables.
> > This is usually fine unless some path write them very often.
> >
> > This is the case for the function and function graph tracers
> > that disable irqs for each entry saved (except if the function
> > tracer is in preempt disabled only mode).
> > And calls to local_irq_save/restore() increment hardirqs_on_events
> > and hardirqs_off_events stats (or similar stats for redundant
> > versions).
> >
> > Incrementing these global vars for each function ends up in too
> > much cache bouncing if lockstats are enabled.
> >
> > To solve this, implement the debug_atomic_*() operations using
> > per cpu vars.
> >
> >
>
> So I really have to ask, why?
>
> This is CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCKDEP code, so its default off, and used to debug
> lockdep. Debug code should be as simple as possible, and preferably
> should not care about performance where possible.
>
> So why complicate this?
>
Also at worst it adds no more than 20 lines of code...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-06 9:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-28 0:29 [PATCH v3] lockdep: Make lockstats counting per cpu Frederic Weisbecker
2010-04-04 14:50 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-04-05 22:10 ` [PATCH] " Frederic Weisbecker
2010-04-06 8:32 ` [tip:core/locking] lockstat: Make lockstat " tip-bot for Frederic Weisbecker
2010-04-06 8:46 ` [PATCH] lockdep: Make lockstats " Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-06 9:24 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-04-06 9:25 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-03-26 2:22 Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-26 3:11 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-26 3:13 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-26 9:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-03-26 17:11 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-26 6:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-26 7:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-26 17:43 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-26 17:39 ` Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100406092544.GB5147@nowhere \
--to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox