public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lockdep: Make lockstats counting per cpu
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 11:25:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100406092544.GB5147@nowhere> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1270543587.1597.742.camel@laptop>

On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 10:46:27AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 00:10 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > Locking statistics are implemented using global atomic variables.
> > This is usually fine unless some path write them very often.
> > 
> > This is the case for the function and function graph tracers
> > that disable irqs for each entry saved (except if the function
> > tracer is in preempt disabled only mode).
> > And calls to local_irq_save/restore() increment hardirqs_on_events
> > and hardirqs_off_events stats (or similar stats for redundant
> > versions).
> > 
> > Incrementing these global vars for each function ends up in too
> > much cache bouncing if lockstats are enabled.
> > 
> > To solve this, implement the debug_atomic_*() operations using
> > per cpu vars.
> > 
> > 
> 
> So I really have to ask, why?
> 
> This is CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCKDEP code, so its default off, and used to debug
> lockdep. Debug code should be as simple as possible, and preferably
> should not care about performance where possible.
> 
> So why complicate this?
> 


Also at worst it adds no more than 20 lines of code...


  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-04-06  9:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-28  0:29 [PATCH v3] lockdep: Make lockstats counting per cpu Frederic Weisbecker
2010-04-04 14:50 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-04-05 22:10 ` [PATCH] " Frederic Weisbecker
2010-04-06  8:32   ` [tip:core/locking] lockstat: Make lockstat " tip-bot for Frederic Weisbecker
2010-04-06  8:46   ` [PATCH] lockdep: Make lockstats " Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-06  9:24     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-04-06  9:25     ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-03-26  2:22 Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-26  3:11 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-26  3:13   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-26  9:16   ` Ingo Molnar
2010-03-26 17:11     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-26  6:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-26  7:48   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-26 17:43     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-26 17:39   ` Frederic Weisbecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100406092544.GB5147@nowhere \
    --to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox