public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: Rick Sherm <rick.sherm@yahoo.com>
Cc: linux-numa@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Memory policy question for NUMA arch....
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 11:00:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100407090014.GD18855@one.firstfloor.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <524835.89860.qm@web114303.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>

On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 01:46:44PM -0700, Rick Sherm wrote:
> On a NUMA host, if a driver calls __get_free_pages() then 
> it will eventually invoke ->alloc_pages_current(..). The comment 
> above/within alloc_pages_current() says 'current->mempolicy' will be 
> used.So what memory policy will kick-in if the driver is trying to 
> allocate some memory blocks during driver load time(say from probe_one)? System-wide default policy,correct?

Actually the policy of the modprobe or the kernel boot up if built in
(which is interleaving)

> 
> What if the driver wishes to i) stay confined to a 'cpulist' OR ii) use a different mem-policy? How 
> do I achieve this?
> I will choose the 'cpulist' after I am successfuly able to affinitize the MSI-X vectors.

You can do that right now by running numactl ... modprobe ...

Yes there should be probably a better way, like using a policy
based on the affinity of the PCI device.

-Andi

-- 
ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.

       reply	other threads:[~2010-04-07  9:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <524835.89860.qm@web114303.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
2010-04-07  9:00 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2010-04-07 15:48   ` Memory policy question for NUMA arch Rick Sherm
2010-04-07 17:27     ` Lee Schermerhorn
2010-04-20 20:34 Chetan Loke
     [not found] <243351.5510.qm@web111910.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
2010-04-16 23:17 ` Chetan Loke
2010-04-17  6:35   ` Andi Kleen
2010-04-17 14:59     ` Chetan Loke
2010-04-17 19:30       ` Andi Kleen
2010-04-19 15:16   ` Lee Schermerhorn
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-04-06 19:29 Rick Sherm

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100407090014.GD18855@one.firstfloor.org \
    --to=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-numa@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rick.sherm@yahoo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox