public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu,
	laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca,
	josh@joshtriplett.org, dvhltc@us.ibm.com, niv@us.ibm.com,
	tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/urgent 1/4] rcu: add rcu_access_pointer and rcu_dereference_protected
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 09:57:35 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100409165735.GB2421@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1270805058.2623.72.camel@edumazet-laptop>

On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 11:24:18AM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Le vendredi 09 avril 2010 à 10:10 +0100, David Howells a écrit :
> > Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > +#define rcu_access_pointer(p) ((void *)ACCESS_ONCE(p))
> > > ...
> > > +#define rcu_access_pointer(p)		((void *)ACCESS_ONCE(p))
> > 
> > There's no difference between your two versions of rcu_access_pointer(), so
> > you could move that whole construct outside of the #ifdef'ed section.
> > 
> > Other than that:
> > 
> > Acked-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
> 
> I also prefer to keep type checking if possible
> 
> #define rcu_access_pointer(p)		(ACCESS_ONCE(p))

Yikes!  I was obsessing on preventing people from dereferencing the
pointer, but you are quite right, they might be comparing it to a
constant pointer to check for array bounds or for use of a statically
allocated emergency-pool item.

I will fix and resubmit.

> Other than that:
> 
> Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>

							Thanx, Paul

  reply	other threads:[~2010-04-09 16:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-04-09  5:47 [PATCH tip/core/urgent] rcu: updates for RCU lockdep Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-09  5:47 ` [PATCH tip/core/urgent 1/4] rcu: add rcu_access_pointer and rcu_dereference_protected Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-09  9:10   ` David Howells
2010-04-09  9:24     ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-09 16:57       ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2010-04-12 19:24         ` Josh Triplett
2010-04-12 20:30           ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-04-12 20:52             ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-09 16:56     ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-09  5:47 ` [PATCH tip/core/urgent 2/4] RCU: Better explain the condition parameter of rcu_dereference_check() Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-09  9:11   ` David Howells
2010-04-09  5:47 ` [PATCH tip/core/urgent 3/4] rcu: Update docs for rcu_access_pointer and rcu_dereference_protected Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-09  9:16   ` David Howells
2010-04-09  5:47 ` [PATCH tip/core/urgent 4/4] rcu: fix syntax error in rcu_dereference_check() example in comment Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-09  9:17   ` David Howells
2010-04-09 16:59     ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-09  8:59 ` [PATCH tip/core/urgent] rcu: updates for RCU lockdep Lai Jiangshan
2010-04-09 22:38 ` [PATCH tip/core/urgent] v2 " Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-09 22:39   ` [PATCH tip/core/urgent 1/3] rcu: add rcu_access_pointer and rcu_dereference_protected Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-10  6:03     ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-10  8:13     ` David Howells
2010-04-14 15:00     ` [tip:core/urgent] rcu: Add " tip-bot for Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-09 22:39   ` [PATCH tip/core/urgent 2/3] RCU: Better explain the condition parameter of rcu_dereference_check() Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-14 15:01     ` [tip:core/urgent] rcu: " tip-bot for David Howells
2010-04-09 22:39   ` [PATCH tip/core/urgent 3/3] rcu: Update docs for rcu_access_pointer and rcu_dereference_protected Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-14 15:01     ` [tip:core/urgent] " tip-bot for Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100409165735.GB2421@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=dvhltc@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox