From: "Hans-Peter Jansen" <hpj@urpla.net>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, opensuse-kernel@opensuse.org,
xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: 2.6.34-rc3: simple du (on a big xfs tree) triggers oom killer [bisected: 57817c68229984818fea9e614d6f95249c3fb098]
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 10:50:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201004131050.36395.hpj@urpla.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100412223241.GM2493@dastard>
On Tuesday 13 April 2010, 00:32:41 Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 12:02:20AM +0200, Hans-Peter Jansen wrote:
> > On Wednesday 07 April 2010, 03:45:33 Dave Chinner wrote:
> >
> > > The patches below apply to the xfs-dev tree, which is currently at
> > > 34-rc1. If they don't apply, let me know and I'll redo them against
> > > a vanilla kernel tree. Can you test them to see if the problem goes
> > > away? If the problem is fixed, I'll push them for a proper review
> > > cycle...
> >
> > Of course, you did the original patch for a reason... Therefor I would
> > love to test your patches. I've tried to apply them to 2.6.33.2, but
> > after fixing the same reject as noted below, I'm stuck here:
> >
> > /usr/src/packages/BUILD/kernel-default-2.6.33.2/linux-2.6.33/fs/xfs/lin
> >ux-2.6/xfs_sync.c: In function 'xfs_reclaim_inode_shrink':
> > /usr/src/packages/BUILD/kernel-default-2.6.33.2/linux-2.6.33/fs/xfs/lin
> >ux-2.6/xfs_sync.c:805: error: implicit declaration of function
> > 'xfs_perag_get'
> > /usr/src/packages/BUILD/kernel-default-2.6.33.2/linux-2.6.33/fs/xfs/lin
> >ux-2.6/xfs_sync.c:805: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer
> > without a cast
> > /usr/src/packages/BUILD/kernel-default-2.6.33.2/linux-2.6.33/fs/xfs/lin
> >ux-2.6/xfs_sync.c:807: error: implicit declaration of function
> > 'xfs_perag_put'
> >
> > Now I see, that there happened a rename of the offending functions, but
> > also they've grown a radix_tree structure and locking. How do I handle
> > that?
>
> With difficulty. I'd need to backport it to match the .33 code,
> which may or may not be trivial...
Dave, may I ask you kindly for briefly elaborating on the worst consequences
of just reverting this hunk, as I've done before?
> > BTW, your patches do not apply to Linus' current git tree either:
> > patching file fs/xfs/quota/xfs_qm.c
> > Hunk #1 succeeded at 72 (offset 3 lines).
> > Hunk #2 FAILED at 2120.
> > 1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
> > fs/xfs/quota/xfs_qm.c.rej I'm able to resolve this, but 2.6.34-current
> > does give me some other trouble, that I need to get by (PS2 keyboard
> > stops working eventually)..
>
> Yeah, there's another patch in my xfs-dev tree that changes that.
> I'll rebase it on a clean linux tree before I post it again.
I've briefly tested this with a codebase somewhere between -rc3 and -rc4,
and it survived the du test, but it suffered from some strange network drop
outs, that aren't funny on a nfs server...
Will retest your patches after opensuse-current catched up with -rc4.
Hopefully, the most blatant stability issues are fixed by then.
Cheers,
Pete
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-13 8:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-04 22:49 2.6.34-rc3: simple du (on a big xfs tree) triggers oom killer Hans-Peter Jansen
2010-04-05 0:49 ` Dave Chinner
2010-04-05 11:35 ` Hans-Peter Jansen
2010-04-05 23:06 ` Dave Chinner
2010-04-06 14:52 ` 2.6.34-rc3: simple du (on a big xfs tree) triggers oom killer [bisected: 57817c68229984818fea9e614d6f95249c3fb098] Hans-Peter Jansen
2010-04-06 23:11 ` Dave Chinner
2010-04-07 1:45 ` Dave Chinner
2010-04-07 22:02 ` Hans-Peter Jansen
2010-04-12 22:32 ` Dave Chinner
2010-04-13 8:50 ` Hans-Peter Jansen [this message]
2010-04-13 9:18 ` Dave Chinner
2010-04-13 9:42 ` Hans-Peter Jansen
2010-04-24 16:44 ` Hans-Peter Jansen
2010-04-24 21:23 ` Emmanuel Florac
2010-04-24 22:30 ` Hans-Peter Jansen
2010-04-24 22:40 ` [opensuse-kernel] " Justin P. Mattock
2010-04-24 22:41 ` Justin P. Mattock
2010-04-25 13:04 ` Emmanuel Florac
2010-04-25 16:27 ` Greg KH
2010-04-25 16:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-04-25 18:18 ` Greg KH
2010-04-26 0:36 ` Dave Chinner
2010-04-27 0:02 ` Greg KH
2010-04-26 0:32 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201004131050.36395.hpj@urpla.net \
--to=hpj@urpla.net \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=opensuse-kernel@opensuse.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox