public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@parisplace.org>,
	Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage - include/linux/cgroup.h:492 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection!
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 08:47:15 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100415154715.GI2471@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1271242058.32749.19.camel@laptop>

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 12:47:38PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-04-12 at 20:47 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-04-12 at 14:44 -0400, Eric Paris wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 11:28 PM, Paul E. McKenney
> > > <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > I know you indicated this was fixed in mainline and I see that set of
> > > commits objects, but I'm seeing the below spew from linux-next today.
> > > 
> > > tree: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git
> > > tag: next-20100412
> > > commit: bbeecf185fe464ccd7ee97ce6d3646ad686995b4
> > > 
> > > [    0.035602] ===================================================
> > > [    0.036003] [ INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage. ]
> > > [    0.037006] ---------------------------------------------------
> > > [    0.038004] include/linux/cgroup.h:533 invoked
> > > rcu_dereference_check() without protection!
> > > [    0.039003]
> > > [    0.039004] other info that might help us debug this:
> > > [    0.039004]
> > > [    0.040003]
> > > [    0.040004] rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 0
> > > [    0.041004] no locks held by swapper/0.
> > > [    0.042003]
> > > [    0.042004] stack backtrace:
> > > [    0.043005] Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.34-rc3-next-20100412+ #65
> > > [    0.044003] Call Trace:
> > > [    0.045015]  [<ffffffff8108584f>] lockdep_rcu_dereference+0xaf/0xc0
> > > [    0.046010]  [<ffffffff81044812>] set_task_cpu+0x2d2/0x370
> > 
> > Oh, right, I still have to sort that out.
> > 
> > I need to figure out how all that scheduler and cgroup muck interact to
> > fix this.
> 
> I think the below should cure this..

Looks reasonable to me!

Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
> ---
>  kernel/sched.c |   10 ++++++++++
>  1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
> index 3acf694..2e06d87 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched.c
> @@ -323,6 +323,15 @@ static inline struct task_group *task_group(struct task_struct *p)
>  /* Change a task's cfs_rq and parent entity if it moves across CPUs/groups */
>  static inline void set_task_rq(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int cpu)
>  {
> +	/*
> +	 * Strictly speaking this rcu_read_lock() is not needed since the
> +	 * task_group is tied to the cgroup, which in turn can never go away
> +	 * as long as there are tasks attached to it.
> +	 *
> +	 * However since task_group() uses task_subsys_state() which is an
> +	 * rcu_dereference() user, this quiets CONFIG_PROVE_RCU.
> +	 */
> +	rcu_read_lock();
>  #ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
>  	p->se.cfs_rq = task_group(p)->cfs_rq[cpu];
>  	p->se.parent = task_group(p)->se[cpu];
> @@ -332,6 +341,7 @@ static inline void set_task_rq(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int cpu)
>  	p->rt.rt_rq  = task_group(p)->rt_rq[cpu];
>  	p->rt.parent = task_group(p)->rt_se[cpu];
>  #endif
> +	rcu_read_unlock();
>  }
> 
>  #else
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2010-04-15 15:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-08  1:26 INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage - include/linux/cgroup.h:492 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection! Miles Lane
2010-03-11  3:28 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-12 18:44   ` Eric Paris
2010-04-12 18:47     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-14 10:47       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-15 15:47         ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2010-04-19  3:45           ` Lai Jiangshan
2010-04-19 18:26         ` Eric Paris
2010-04-19 23:01           ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-20  1:25             ` Eric Paris
2010-04-20  3:04               ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-20  7:21                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-20  8:23                 ` [PATCH] RCU: don't turn off lockdep when find suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage Lai Jiangshan
2010-04-20  8:36                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-20 12:31                   ` Eric Paris
2010-04-20 13:28                     ` Paul E. McKenney
     [not found]                     ` <j2ya44ae5cd1004200545q6be4ec82o18ae99d93e8c29c7@mail.gmail.com>
2010-04-20 13:52                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-20 15:38                         ` Miles Lane
2010-04-21  6:04                           ` Borislav Petkov
2010-04-21 21:45                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-21 21:35                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-21 21:48                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-21 21:57                             ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-21 22:14                               ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-21 23:26                                 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-04-22 14:56                             ` Vivek Goyal
2010-04-22 16:01                               ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-23 12:50                                 ` Miles Lane
2010-04-23 19:42                                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-23 19:43                                     ` [PATCH v2.6.34-rc5 01/12] rcu: Fix RCU lockdep splat in set_task_cpu on fork path Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-23 19:43                                     ` [PATCH v2.6.34-rc5 02/12] rcu: fix RCU lockdep splat on freezer_fork path Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-23 19:43                                     ` [PATCH v2.6.34-rc5 03/12] rcu: leave lockdep enabled after RCU lockdep splat Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-23 19:43                                     ` [PATCH v2.6.34-rc5 04/12] NFSv4: Fix the locking in nfs_inode_reclaim_delegation() Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-23 19:43                                     ` [PATCH v2.6.34-rc5 05/12] NFS: Fix RCU issues in the NFSv4 delegation code Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-23 19:43                                     ` [PATCH v2.6.34-rc5 06/12] KEYS: Fix an RCU warning Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-23 19:43                                     ` [PATCH v2.6.34-rc5 07/12] KEYS: Fix an RCU warning in the reading of user keys Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-23 19:43                                     ` [PATCH v2.6.34-rc5 08/12] cgroup: Fix an RCU warning in cgroup_path() Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-23 19:43                                     ` [PATCH v2.6.34-rc5 09/12] cgroup: Fix an RCU warning in alloc_css_id() Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-23 19:43                                     ` [PATCH v2.6.34-rc5 10/12] sched: Fix an RCU warning in print_task() Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-23 19:43                                     ` [PATCH v2.6.34-rc5 11/12] cgroup: Check task_lock in task_subsys_state() Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-23 19:43                                     ` [PATCH v2.6.34-rc5 12/12] memcg: css_id() must be called under rcu_read_lock() Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-23 22:59                                     ` [PATCH] RCU: don't turn off lockdep when find suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage Miles Lane
2010-04-24  5:35                                       ` Miles Lane
2010-04-25  2:36                                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-25  2:34                                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-25  7:45                                         ` Johannes Berg
2010-04-25  7:49                                           ` David Miller
2010-04-26  2:07                                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-25 15:49                                         ` Miles Lane
2010-04-25 20:20                                           ` Miles Lane
2010-04-26 16:09                                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-26 18:35                                               ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-04-27  4:27                                                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-27 16:22                                                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-27 16:33                                                     ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-27 17:58                                                     ` Miles Lane
2010-04-27 23:31                                                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-27 23:42                                                         ` David Miller
2010-04-27 23:52                                                           ` Paul E. McKenney
     [not found]                                         ` <p2ka44ae5cd1004281358n86ce29d2tbece16b2fb974dab@mail.gmail.com>
2010-04-28 21:37                                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-01 17:26                         ` Miles Lane
2010-05-01 21:55                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-02  2:00                             ` Miles Lane
2010-05-02  4:11                               ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-21  1:05             ` INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage - include/linux/cgroup.h:492 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection! Li Zefan
2010-04-21  3:14               ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-14 16:03     ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100415154715.GI2471@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=eparis@parisplace.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miles.lane@gmail.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox