From: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
r6144 <rainy6144@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Darren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com>,
tglx <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>
Subject: Re: Process-shared futexes on hugepages puts the kernel in an infinite loop in 2.6.32.11; is this fixed now?
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 17:48:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100419154846.GY32034@random.random> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100419153245.GX19264@csn.ul.ie>
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 04:32:45PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> +#define HUGETLB_PRIVATE_MAPPING (0x2e4 | PAGE_MAPPING_ANON)
Cute indeed.
BTW, just in case I tested this on transparent hugepage and it works
fine (it uses no cpu and can be killed with C^c). I had to hack it
like below to allocate the semaphore on hugepages without
khugepaged. I verified 1 hugepage is allocated (thanks to memory
compaction there's an huge excess of hugepages compared to what my
regular apps can eat ;). Furthermore I found gcc bypasses malloc so a
small patch to gcc should move it all into hugepages. Then maybe we
can build the kernel faster and definitely translate.o will build 8%
faster with the default khugepaged scan_sleep_millisecs settings
(waiting to be confirmed but I exclude bad surprises, whatever runs
fast with khugepaged has will run even faster without it if something,
or equal in the worst case).
Thanks,
Andrea
--- process-shared-sem-hugepage.c.orig 2010-04-19 17:43:47.278964888 +0200
+++ process-shared-sem-hugepage.c 2010-04-19 17:44:01.100032774 +0200
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ int main(void)
g_thread_init(NULL);
workers = g_new(GThread *, NWORKER); work_sem = g_new(sem_t, 1);
+ posix_memalign(&work_sem, 2*1024*1024, 2*1024*1024);
result = sem_init(work_sem, TRUE, 0); g_assert(result == 0);
for (i = 0; i < NWORKER; i++) {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-19 15:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-16 15:45 Process-shared futexes on hugepages puts the kernel in an infinite loop in 2.6.32.11; is this fixed now? r6144
2010-04-16 20:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-19 11:43 ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-19 11:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-19 15:32 ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-19 15:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-19 16:11 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2010-04-19 16:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-19 16:32 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2010-04-19 16:34 ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-19 15:48 ` Andrea Arcangeli [this message]
2010-04-19 16:04 ` Darren Hart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100419154846.GY32034@random.random \
--to=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=dvhltc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=lee.schermerhorn@hp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rainy6144@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox