From: maximilian attems <max@stro.at>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org,
Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.hengli.com.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fcntl.h: define AT_EACCESS
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 23:57:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100419215711.GR10984@baikonur.stro.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100419144729.2b8180e8.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 02:47:29PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 05:08:00 +0200
> maximilian attems <max@stro.at> wrote:
>
> > noticed on a klibc build of dash that someone had left out that def:
> > usr/dash/bltin/test.c:490: error: ___AT_EACCESS___ undeclared (first use in thiction)
> >
> > Cc: stable@kernel.org
> > Cc: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>
> > Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
> > Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
> > Signed-off-by: maximilian attems <max@stro.at>
> > ---
> > include/linux/fcntl.h | 2 ++
> > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/fcntl.h b/include/linux/fcntl.h
> > index 8603740..8bb001d 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/fcntl.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/fcntl.h
> > @@ -39,6 +39,8 @@
> > #define AT_REMOVEDIR 0x200 /* Remove directory instead of
> > unlinking file. */
> > #define AT_SYMLINK_FOLLOW 0x400 /* Follow symbolic links. */
> > +#define AT_EACCESS 0x200 /* Test access permitted for
> > + effective IDs, not real IDs. */
> >
>
> I'm all confused.
>
> The affects sys_faccesat(), yes? But sys_faccesat() never gets passed
> a `flags' argument so how does the behaviour which the FACCESSAT(2)
> manpage describes get implemented?
>
> This patch doesn't actually change kernel behaviour, so how can setting
> AT_EACCESS change any syscall's actions?
>
> It's a bit of a worry that the proposed value for AT_EACCESS duplicates
> AT_REMOVEDIR. I guess that, despite apeparances, they're different
> namespaces. Any thoughts on the implications of this?
glibc fcntl.h defines AT_EACCESS in the same way as aboves patch,
concerning the implementation, others should know better.
the dash code calling faccessat has the 4 params,
klibc faccessat had only 3 args, guess nobody had used it before.
the relevant dash code reads:
#ifdef HAVE_FACCESSAT
static int test_file_access(const char *path, int mode)
{
return !faccessat(AT_FDCWD, path, mode, AT_EACCESS);
}
#else /* HAVE_FACCESSAT */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-19 22:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-16 3:08 [PATCH] fcntl.h: define AT_EACCESS maximilian attems
2010-04-19 21:47 ` Andrew Morton
2010-04-19 21:57 ` maximilian attems [this message]
2010-04-19 22:10 ` Ulrich Drepper
2010-04-19 22:11 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-04-19 22:20 ` David Wagner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100419215711.GR10984@baikonur.stro.at \
--to=max@stro.at \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=drepper@redhat.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.hengli.com.au \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox