Re: [PATCH 1/5] Add a global synchronization point for pvclock

Avi Kivity
2010-04-20T18:54:31Z

On 04/20/2010 09:23 PM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> On 04/20/2010 02:31 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>> btw, do you want this code in pvclock.c, or shall we keep it kvmclock
>> specific?
>>
> I think its a pvclock-level fix. I'd been hoping to avoid having
> something like this, but I think its ultimately necessary.
>

Did you observe drift on Xen, or is this "ultimately" pointing at the
future?

--
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.