From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Andy Isaacson <adi@hexapodia.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hch@lst.de
Subject: Re: [2.6.34 regression] utsname.domainname not set in x86_32 processes
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 05:22:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100420032200.GA13131@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100419192147.GP11130@hexapodia.org>
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 12:21:47PM -0700, Andy Isaacson wrote:
> 2.6.34-rc4 uname(2) from a x86_32 process copies out 325 bytes rather
> than the 390 bytes that 2.6.31 copied out (and that userland expects):
Which means we're missing exactly the domainname field in new_utsname,
which differenciates it from the old utsname structure. Looks like we
end up calling the old uname sscall instead of the new one for some
reason.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-20 3:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-19 19:21 [2.6.34 regression] utsname.domainname not set in x86_32 processes Andy Isaacson
2010-04-19 21:46 ` Andy Isaacson
2010-04-20 3:22 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100420032200.GA13131@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=adi@hexapodia.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox