From: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
mingo@elte.hu, peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
davej@redhat.com, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] ondemand: Solve the big performance issue with ondemand during disk IO
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 11:29:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201004201129.02370.trenn@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100418120346.1b478410@infradead.org>
On Sunday 18 April 2010 21:03:46 Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> From 27966bedabea83c4f3ae77507eceb746b1f6ebae Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
> Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2010 11:15:56 -0700
> Subject: [PATCH 7/7] ondemand: Solve the big performance issue with ondemand during disk IO
> This algorithm falls flat on its face in the light of workloads where
> you're alternatingly disk and CPU bound, such as the ever popular
> "git grep", but also things like startup of programs and maildir using
> email clients... much to the chagarin of Andrew Morton.
Have you looked at:
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/cpuinfo_transition_latency
and
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/ondemand/sampling_rate
Transition latency comes from ACPI tables and sampling rate depends
on it.
Reducing the sampling rate, significantly reduces performance loss.
There were bugs in this area, on latest kernels with latest (MSR switching)
HW you should see:
cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/ondemand/sampling_rate
10000
Thomas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-20 9:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-18 18:59 [PATCH 0/7] Fix performance issue with ondemand governor Arjan van de Ven
2010-04-18 19:00 ` [PATCH 1/7] sched: add a comment to get_cpu_idle_time_us() Arjan van de Ven
2010-04-26 19:25 ` Rik van Riel
2010-04-18 19:01 ` [PATCH 2/7] sched: introduce a function to update the idle statistics Arjan van de Ven
2010-04-26 20:11 ` Rik van Riel
2010-04-18 19:01 ` [PATCH 3/7] sched: update the idle statistics in get_cpu_idle_time_us() Arjan van de Ven
2010-04-26 20:36 ` Rik van Riel
2010-04-18 19:02 ` [PATCH 4/7] sched: fold updating of the last update time into update_ts_time_stats() Arjan van de Ven
2010-04-26 20:58 ` Rik van Riel
2010-04-18 19:02 ` [PATCH 5/7] sched: eliminate the ts->idle_lastupdate field Arjan van de Ven
2010-04-26 21:00 ` Rik van Riel
2010-04-18 19:03 ` [PATCH 6/7] sched: introduce get_cpu_iowait_time_us() Arjan van de Ven
2010-04-26 21:05 ` Rik van Riel
2010-04-18 19:03 ` [PATCH 7/7] ondemand: Solve the big performance issue with ondemand during disk IO Arjan van de Ven
2010-04-19 8:29 ` Éric Piel
2010-04-19 13:43 ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-04-19 14:30 ` Éric Piel
2010-04-19 14:47 ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-04-20 9:24 ` Thomas Renninger
2010-04-27 0:29 ` Mike Chan
2010-04-27 13:01 ` Pavel Machek
2010-04-27 18:10 ` Mike Chan
2010-04-19 9:09 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2010-04-19 13:46 ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-04-19 15:29 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2010-04-20 0:47 ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-04-20 9:10 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2010-04-20 11:02 ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-04-28 8:57 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2010-04-23 5:26 ` Pavel Machek
2010-04-20 9:29 ` Thomas Renninger [this message]
2010-04-20 11:07 ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-04-23 5:24 ` Pavel Machek
2010-04-23 5:38 ` Willy Tarreau
2010-04-23 8:50 ` Thomas Renninger
2010-04-23 16:08 ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-04-27 11:39 ` Thomas Renninger
2010-05-04 3:48 ` [PATCH 8/7] cpufreq: make the iowait-is-busy-time a sysfs tunable Arjan van de Ven
2010-05-04 4:16 ` Willy Tarreau
2010-05-04 5:43 ` Pavel Machek
2010-05-04 13:51 ` Rik van Riel
2010-04-23 14:10 ` [PATCH 7/7] ondemand: Solve the big performance issue with ondemand during disk IO Arjan van de Ven
2010-04-23 15:35 ` Willy Tarreau
2010-04-23 13:52 ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-04-23 8:38 ` Pavel Machek
2010-04-23 16:06 ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-04-24 4:56 ` Pavel Machek
2010-05-01 23:29 ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-04-26 21:30 ` Rik van Riel
2010-04-26 21:41 ` [PATCH 0/7] Fix performance issue with ondemand governor Dave Jones
2010-04-26 21:45 ` Dominik Brodowski
2010-04-26 21:59 ` Rik van Riel
2010-04-26 22:05 ` Dominik Brodowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201004201129.02370.trenn@suse.de \
--to=trenn@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=cpufreq@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox