From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751521Ab0DTPFe (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Apr 2010 11:05:34 -0400 Received: from e6.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.146]:48733 "EHLO e6.ny.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750826Ab0DTPFc (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Apr 2010 11:05:32 -0400 Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 08:05:22 -0700 From: "Paul E. McKenney" To: David Howells Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca, josh@joshtriplett.org, dvhltc@us.ibm.com, niv@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, eric.dumazet@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 07/16] rcu: shrink rcutiny by making synchronize_rcu_bh() be inline Message-ID: <20100420150522.GD2628@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reply-To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com References: <1271355219-20714-7-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20100415181255.GA19588@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <31621.1271758266@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <31621.1271758266@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 11:11:06AM +0100, David Howells wrote: > > Does it make sense for synchronize_sched() to be inline too? Since that's > just a wrapper around cond_resched(), which is normally just a wrapper around > _cond_resched(). I tried that, and quickly descended into #include hell. :-( Thanx, Paul > Otherwise: > > Acked-by: David Howells