From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755510Ab0DUXTp (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Apr 2010 19:19:45 -0400 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:33820 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755402Ab0DUXTn (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Apr 2010 19:19:43 -0400 Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 16:19:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20100421.161948.253502140.davem@davemloft.net> To: eric.dumazet@gmail.com Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6] fasync: RCU locking From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <1271230961.16881.630.camel@edumazet-laptop> References: <1271230961.16881.630.camel@edumazet-laptop> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.3 on Emacs 23.1 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Eric Dumazet Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 09:42:41 +0200 > [PATCH net-next-2.6] fasync: RCU locking > > kill_fasync() uses a central rwlock, candidate for RCU conversion. > > We can remove __kill_fasync() direct use in net, and rename it to > kill_fasync_rcu() > > Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet This looks good to me, applied, thanks Eric.