Re: INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage - include/linux/cgroup.h:492 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection!

["Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>]

On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 09:05:50AM +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
> > commit 2836f18139267ea918ed2cf39023fb0eb38c4361
> > Author: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > Date:   Mon Apr 19 15:59:50 2010 -0700
> > 
> >     rcu: fix RCU lockdep splat on freezer_fork path
> >     
> >     Add an RCU read-side critical section to suppress this false positive.
> >     
> >     Located-by: Eric Paris <eparis@parisplace.org>
> >     Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > 
> > diff --git a/kernel/cgroup_freezer.c b/kernel/cgroup_freezer.c
> > index da5e139..e5c0244 100644
> > --- a/kernel/cgroup_freezer.c
> > +++ b/kernel/cgroup_freezer.c
> > @@ -205,9 +205,12 @@ static void freezer_fork(struct cgroup_subsys *ss, struct task_struct *task)
> >  	 * No lock is needed, since the task isn't on tasklist yet,
> >  	 * so it can't be moved to another cgroup, which means the
> >  	 * freezer won't be removed and will be valid during this
> > -	 * function call.
> > +	 * function call.  Nevertheless, apply RCU read-side critical
> > +	 * section to suppress RCU lockdep false positives.
> >  	 */
> 
> It was me that added the original comment.
> 
> > +	rcu_read_lock();
> >  	freezer = task_freezer(task);
> > +	rcu_read_unlock();
> >  
> >  	/*
> >  	 * The root cgroup is non-freezable, so we can skip the
> 
> Acked-by: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>

Thank you, Li!  I have added your Acked-by.

							Thanx, Paul