public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: pci_get_dev_by_id() from interrupt handlers
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 12:41:38 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100421104138.GH31537@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1271845271.1776.74.camel@laptop>

On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 12:21:11PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 12:05 +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > 
> > > Why not do the whole thing in an interrupt task as the whole thing
> > > sounds like something that shouldn't be done in interrupt context,
> > > right?  Now that we have this type of functionality, we should take
> > > advantage of it :)
> > 
> > Ok, I think I move the IOMMU interrupt handling to a tasklet.
> > 
> tasklet is softirq context, and is not what gregkh was talking about.
> 
> You'd still need to change the klist spinlock to be softirq-safe.

Ah right. Thanks for pointing this out. I couldn't find much about the
interrupt tasks. Is it about the request_threaded_irq interface? And
this would be run in the context of a kernel thread, right?

	Joerg



  reply	other threads:[~2010-04-21 10:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-04-20 16:04 pci_get_dev_by_id() from interrupt handlers Joerg Roedel
2010-04-20 16:32 ` Greg KH
2010-04-20 17:35   ` Joerg Roedel
2010-04-20 17:52     ` Greg KH
2010-04-21 10:05       ` Joerg Roedel
2010-04-21 10:21         ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-21 10:41           ` Joerg Roedel [this message]
2010-04-21 10:46             ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-21 10:55               ` Joerg Roedel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100421104138.GH31537@amd.com \
    --to=joerg.roedel@amd.com \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox