Re: platform_bus: Allow runtime PM by default

Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-10T21:09:46Z

On Friday 07 May 2010, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> On Fri, 7 May 2010 14:27:46 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 08:41:41PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > > Jean, the patch we're discussing depends on the
> > > "i2c: Fix bus-level power management callbacks" patch that's in your tree right
> > > now. Would it be possible to move the i2c patch to my tree, or alternatively
> > > would it be acceptable for you to merge a core PM patch through your tree?
> >
> > Jean, any updates on this?
>
> I'm sorry, I never received Rafael's initial message. I just checked
> through my mailbox and it isn't there.
>
> The current status is that patch "i2c: Fix bus-level power management
> callbacks" is currently queued in my i2c tree at:
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/jdelvare/linux-2.6/jdelvare-i2c/i2c-fix-bus-level-power-management-callbacks.patch
> and is scheduled to be merged in 2.6.35-rc1. If this isn't OK, we can
> change the plan.
>
> Merging a core PM patch through the i2c tree would be quite confusing,
> I think, and might draw even more odd dependencies. So I'd rather have
> the i2c patch moved to the PM staging tree (or whatever tree the
> dependent patch lives in.) Just let me know and I'll drop my copy.

The patch above has been applied to suspend-2.6/linux-next along with the
Mark's $subject patch.

I have converted your sign-off into an ack, hope that's fine.

Thanks,
Rafael