Re: platform_bus: Allow runtime PM by default

Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-04-23T18:26:25Z

On Friday 23 April 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday 23 April 2010, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 09:11:57AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 04:57:21PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> >
> > > > Turns out it's commit ad53012 "i2c: Fix bus-level power management
> > > > callbacks" in the PM tree that it depends on. Does it make sense to
> > > > merge this via there rather than via your tree?
> >
> > > Why would an i2c specific patch be needed here? Do you have a pointer
> > > to that patch?
> >
> > Despite the patch title being I2C specific it actually includes exposing
> > some of the runtime PM implementation to external users - I2C being the
> > first user of the generic PM runtime callbacks that I'm trying to use in
> > the platform device implementation.
> >
> > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/sfr/linux-next.git;a=commitdiff;h=ad530128cd302e5df930b6eb4d4c7e162c40fcb2;hp=b938b00444e900f1c86e754539e3d00f172c184e
> > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/sfr/linux-next.git;a=commitdiff;h=d690b2cd222afc75320b9b8e9da7df02e9e630ca
> >
> > > And yes, if it depends on something else in the PM tree, feel free to
> > > send this patch also through it, I have no objection to that. Rafael,
> > > care to pick it up? Mark, you might have to resend it to him.
> >
> > OK, Raphael please let me know if you need a resend.
>
> No, thanks, I have your original post.

Now applied to suspend-2.6/linux-next .

Thanks,
Rafael