public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@us.ibm.com>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation/cred.txt: spinlock no longer implies rcu_read_lock
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 18:24:30 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100424012430.GC2589@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100424004557.GA21297@us.ibm.com>

On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 07:45:57PM -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> So change the credentials documentation to make it clear that rcu
> read lock is required.

Very good!

Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

> Signed-off-by: Serge Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/credentials.txt |    8 ++------
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/credentials.txt b/Documentation/credentials.txt
> index df03169..98a1e9e 100644
> --- a/Documentation/credentials.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/credentials.txt
> @@ -408,9 +408,6 @@ This should be used inside the RCU read lock, as in the following example:
>  		...
>  	}
> 
> -A function need not get RCU read lock to use __task_cred() if it is holding a
> -spinlock at the time as this implicitly holds the RCU read lock.
> -
>  Should it be necessary to hold another task's credentials for a long period of
>  time, and possibly to sleep whilst doing so, then the caller should get a
>  reference on them using:
> @@ -426,14 +423,13 @@ credentials, hiding the RCU magic from the caller:
>  	uid_t task_uid(task)		Task's real UID
>  	uid_t task_euid(task)		Task's effective UID
> 
> -If the caller is holding a spinlock or the RCU read lock at the time anyway,
> -then:
> +If the caller is holding the RCU read lock at the time anyway, then:
> 
>  	__task_cred(task)->uid
>  	__task_cred(task)->euid
> 
>  should be used instead.  Similarly, if multiple aspects of a task's credentials
> -need to be accessed, RCU read lock or a spinlock should be used, __task_cred()
> +need to be accessed, RCU read lock should be used, __task_cred()
>  called, the result stored in a temporary pointer and then the credential
>  aspects called from that before dropping the lock.  This prevents the
>  potentially expensive RCU magic from being invoked multiple times.
> -- 
> 1.6.3.3
> 

      reply	other threads:[~2010-04-24  1:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-04-24  0:45 [PATCH] Documentation/cred.txt: spinlock no longer implies rcu_read_lock Serge E. Hallyn
2010-04-24  1:24 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100424012430.GC2589@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=serue@us.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox