From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>, Jan Blunck <jblunck@suse.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL v2] Preparation for BKL'ed ioctl removal
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 21:12:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201004262112.39906.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1004261104310.3739@i5.linux-foundation.org>
On Monday 26 April 2010 20:08:39 Linus Torvalds wrote:
> I wouldn't mind that. But we've not found people to do it so far, so...
I'll have another go at this tonight, see how far I get doing it
the simplest way for each file.
> NOTE! This has gone through a "allmodconfig" (with staging drivers), but
> only on x86-64. There are quite probably missing architecture conversions
> and/or drivers. But this should be the bulk of them.
Yes, looks good. I've compared it to a previous series of mine that
changed all the files in a different way. A number of those changes
have found their way into your tree by now, and there were only
two left that you didn't catch (see below), and one false positive
where I patched a struct v4l2_file_operations.
> It doesn't look that bad. Just about 100 files affected.
The v4l2_file_operations is actually another can of worms, I count
77 more files with a locked ioctl function in there. I'll put that on
the list of things to do before the BKL is gone.
Arnd
---
Subject: Missing bits from ->ioctl to ->bkl_ioctl conversion
Feel free to fold this into your patch.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/vfs.txt b/Documentation/filesystems/vfs.txt
index 3de2f32..4890683 100644
--- a/Documentation/filesystems/vfs.txt
+++ b/Documentation/filesystems/vfs.txt
@@ -722,7 +722,7 @@ struct file_operations {
ssize_t (*aio_write) (struct kiocb *, const struct iovec *, unsigned long, loff_t);
int (*readdir) (struct file *, void *, filldir_t);
unsigned int (*poll) (struct file *, struct poll_table_struct *);
- int (*ioctl) (struct inode *, struct file *, unsigned int, unsigned long);
+ int (*bkl_ioctl) (struct inode *, struct file *, unsigned int, unsigned long);
long (*unlocked_ioctl) (struct file *, unsigned int, unsigned long);
long (*compat_ioctl) (struct file *, unsigned int, unsigned long);
int (*mmap) (struct file *, struct vm_area_struct *);
diff --git a/sound/oss/au1550_ac97.c b/sound/oss/au1550_ac97.c
index c1070e3..7295781 100644
--- a/sound/oss/au1550_ac97.c
+++ b/sound/oss/au1550_ac97.c
@@ -835,11 +835,11 @@ au1550_ioctl_mixdev(struct inode *inode, struct file *file,
}
static /*const */ struct file_operations au1550_mixer_fops = {
- owner:THIS_MODULE,
- llseek:au1550_llseek,
- ioctl:au1550_ioctl_mixdev,
- open:au1550_open_mixdev,
- release:au1550_release_mixdev,
+ .owner = THIS_MODULE,
+ .llseek = au1550_llseek,
+ .bkl_ioctl = au1550_ioctl_mixdev,
+ .open = au1550_open_mixdev,
+ .release = au1550_release_mixdev,
};
static int
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-26 19:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-16 3:56 [GIT PULL] Preparation for BKL'ed ioctl removal Frederic Weisbecker
2010-04-22 0:48 ` [GIT PULL v2] " Frederic Weisbecker
2010-04-24 15:25 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-04-24 18:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-04-24 18:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-04-24 19:54 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-04-24 20:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-04-24 20:40 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-04-24 22:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-04-25 17:39 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-04-25 17:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-04-25 18:05 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-04-26 8:30 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-04-26 18:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-04-26 19:12 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2010-04-26 20:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-04-26 22:23 ` [PATCH 0/6] Push down BKL into device drivers Arnd Bergmann
2010-04-27 9:14 ` John Kacur
2010-04-26 22:24 ` [PATCH 1/6] dvb: push down BKL into ioctl functions Arnd Bergmann
2010-04-26 22:24 ` [PATCH 2/6] scsi: " Arnd Bergmann
2010-04-26 22:24 ` [PATCH 3/6] isdn: " Arnd Bergmann
2010-04-26 22:24 ` [PATCH 4/6] staging: " Arnd Bergmann
2010-04-27 18:15 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-04-27 18:33 ` Greg KH
2010-04-26 22:24 ` [PATCH 5/6] v4l: always use unlocked_ioctl Arnd Bergmann
2010-04-26 22:24 ` [PATCH 6/6] drivers: push down BKL into various drivers Arnd Bergmann
2010-04-26 20:42 ` [GIT PULL v2] Preparation for BKL'ed ioctl removal David Miller
2010-04-26 22:09 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-04-26 22:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-04-26 23:04 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-04-26 7:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-04-26 11:29 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-04-27 9:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-04-28 13:21 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-04-28 13:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-04-28 14:05 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201004262112.39906.arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jblunck@suse.de \
--cc=jkacur@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox