public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/22] KVM: MMU: Introduce kvm_read_guest_page_x86()
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 17:40:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100427154024.GL11097@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BD6E80A.2000201@redhat.com>

On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 04:35:06PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 04/27/2010 04:20 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:

> >Hmm, difficult since both mmu's are active in the npt-npt case. The
> >arch.mmu struct contains mostly the l1 paging state initialized for
> >shadow paging and different set_cr3/get_cr3/inject_page_fault functions.
> >This keeps the changes to the mmu small and optimize for the common case
> >(a nested npt fault).
> 
> Well, it reduces the changes to the mmu, but it makes a 'struct
> kvm_mmu' incoherent since its meaning depends on whether it is
> nested or not.  For someone reading the code, it is hard to see when
> to use ->nested_mmu or ->mmu.
> 
> Perhaps have
> 
>    struct kvm_mmu base_mmu;
>    struct kvm_mmu nested_mmu;
>    struct kvm_mmu *mmu;
> 
> You could have one patch that mindlessly changes mmu. to mmu->.  The
> impact of the patchset increases, but I think the result is more
> readable.
> 
> It will be a pain adapting the patchset, but easier than updating
> mmu.txt to reflect the current situation.

Okay, I finally read most of mmu.txt :)
I agree that the implemented scheme for using arch.mmu and
arch.nested_mmu is non-obvious. The most complicated thing is that
.gva_to_gpa functions are exchanged between mmu and nested_mmu. This
means that nested_mmu.gva_to_gpa basically walks a page table in a mode
described by arch.mmu while mmu.gva_to_gpa walks the full
two-dimensional page table.
But I also don't yet see how a *mmu pointer would help here. From my
current understanding of the idea the only place to use it would be the
init_kvm_mmu path. But maybe we could also do this to make things more
clear:

	* Rename nested_mmu to l2_mmu and use it to save the current
	  paging mode of the l2 guest
	* Do not switch the the .gva_to_gpa function pointers between
	  mmu contexts and provide a wrapper function for all callers of
	  arch.mmu.gva_to_gpa which uses the right one for the current
	  context. The arch.nested flag is the indicator for which one
	  to use.

Btw. the purpose of the nested-flag is to prevent to reset arch.mmu when
the l2 guest changes his paging mode and we could remove this flag with
a pointer-solution.
Currently its a bit unclear when to use mmu or nested_mmu. With a
pointer it would be unclear to the code reader when to use the pointer
and when to select the mmu_contexts directly.

	Joerg



  reply	other threads:[~2010-04-27 15:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-04-27 10:38 [PATCH 0/22] Nested Paging support for Nested SVM v2 Joerg Roedel
2010-04-27 10:38 ` [PATCH 01/22] KVM: MMU: Check for root_level instead of long mode Joerg Roedel
2010-04-27 10:38 ` [PATCH 02/22] KVM: MMU: Make tdp_enabled a mmu-context parameter Joerg Roedel
2010-04-27 12:06   ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-27 10:38 ` [PATCH 03/22] KVM: MMU: Make set_cr3 a function pointer in kvm_mmu Joerg Roedel
2010-04-27 10:38 ` [PATCH 04/22] KVM: X86: Introduce a tdp_set_cr3 function Joerg Roedel
2010-04-27 10:38 ` [PATCH 05/22] KVM: MMU: Introduce get_cr3 function pointer Joerg Roedel
2010-04-27 10:38 ` [PATCH 06/22] KVM: MMU: Introduce inject_page_fault " Joerg Roedel
2010-04-27 10:38 ` [PATCH 07/22] KVM: SVM: Implement MMU helper functions for Nested Nested Paging Joerg Roedel
2010-04-27 10:38 ` [PATCH 08/22] KVM: MMU: Change init_kvm_softmmu to take a context as parameter Joerg Roedel
2010-04-27 10:38 ` [PATCH 09/22] KVM: MMU: Let is_rsvd_bits_set take mmu context instead of vcpu Joerg Roedel
2010-04-27 10:38 ` [PATCH 10/22] KVM: MMU: Introduce generic walk_addr function Joerg Roedel
2010-04-27 10:38 ` [PATCH 11/22] KVM: MMU: Add infrastructure for two-level page walker Joerg Roedel
2010-04-27 12:34   ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-28 10:52     ` Joerg Roedel
2010-04-28 11:24       ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-28 11:03     ` Joerg Roedel
2010-04-28 11:09       ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-27 10:38 ` [PATCH 12/22] KVM: MMU: Implement nested gva_to_gpa functions Joerg Roedel
2010-04-27 12:37   ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-28 14:20     ` Joerg Roedel
2010-04-27 10:38 ` [PATCH 13/22] KVM: X86: Add kvm_read_guest_page_tdp function Joerg Roedel
2010-04-27 12:42   ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-27 13:10     ` Joerg Roedel
2010-04-27 13:40     ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-27 10:38 ` [PATCH 14/22] KVM: MMU: Make walk_addr_generic capable for two-level walking Joerg Roedel
2010-04-27 10:38 ` [PATCH 15/22] KVM: MMU: Introduce kvm_read_guest_page_x86() Joerg Roedel
2010-04-27 12:52   ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-27 13:20     ` Joerg Roedel
2010-04-27 13:35       ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-27 15:40         ` Joerg Roedel [this message]
2010-04-27 16:09           ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-27 16:27             ` Joerg Roedel
2010-04-28 15:31         ` Joerg Roedel
2010-04-27 10:38 ` [PATCH 16/22] KVM: MMU: Track page fault data in struct vcpu Joerg Roedel
2010-04-27 12:58   ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-27 13:28     ` Joerg Roedel
2010-04-27 13:37       ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-27 13:57         ` Joerg Roedel
2010-04-27 16:02           ` Avi Kivity
2010-05-03 16:32     ` Joerg Roedel
2010-05-04  7:53       ` Avi Kivity
2010-05-04  9:11         ` Roedel, Joerg
2010-05-04  9:20           ` Avi Kivity
2010-05-04  9:37             ` Roedel, Joerg
2010-05-04  9:45               ` Avi Kivity
2010-05-04  9:50                 ` Avi Kivity
2010-05-04 12:00                   ` Roedel, Joerg
2010-05-04 12:04                     ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-27 10:38 ` [PATCH 17/22] KVM: MMU: Propagate the right fault back to the guest after gva_to_gpa Joerg Roedel
2010-04-27 10:38 ` [PATCH 18/22] KVM: X86: Propagate fetch faults Joerg Roedel
2010-04-27 10:38 ` [PATCH 19/22] KVM: MMU: Introduce init_kvm_nested_mmu() Joerg Roedel
2010-04-27 10:38 ` [PATCH 20/22] KVM: SVM: Initialize Nested Nested MMU context on VMRUN Joerg Roedel
2010-04-27 13:01   ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-27 10:38 ` [PATCH 21/22] KVM: SVM: Report Nested Paging support to userspace Joerg Roedel
2010-04-27 10:38 ` [PATCH 22/22] KVM: SVM: Expect two more candiates for exit_int_info Joerg Roedel
2010-04-27 13:03 ` [PATCH 0/22] Nested Paging support for Nested SVM v2 Avi Kivity

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100427154024.GL11097@amd.com \
    --to=joerg.roedel@amd.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox