public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>, Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	nauman@google.com, eric.dumazet@gmail.com,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
	Gui Jianfeng <guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RCU: don't turn off lockdep when find suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 16:31:11 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100427233111.GF2424@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <g2ya44ae5cd1004271058p9f73fba1v3f611693e81869c3@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 01:58:30PM -0400, Miles Lane wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Paul E. McKenney
> <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 09:27:44PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 11:35:10AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> >> > "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
> >> >
> >> > > Eric Dumazet traced these down to a commit from Eric Biederman.
> >> > >
> >> > > If I don't hear from Eric Biederman in a few days, I will attempt a
> >> > > patch, but it would be more likely to be correct coming from someone
> >> > > with a better understanding of the code.  ;-)
> >> >
> >> > I already replied.
> >> >
> >> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/4/21/420
> >>
> >> You did indeed!!!  This experience is giving me an even better appreciation
> >> of the maintainers' ability to keep all their patches straight!
> >>
> >> I will put together something based on your suggestion.
> >
> > How about the following?
> >
> >                                                        Thanx, Paul
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > commit 85fa42bd568ab99c375f018761ae6345249942cd
> > Author: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > Date:   Mon Apr 26 21:40:05 2010 -0700
> >
> >    net: suppress RCU lockdep false positive in twsk_net()
> >
> >    Calls to twsk_net() are in some cases protected by reference counting
> >    as an alternative to RCU protection.  Cases covered by reference counts
> >    include __inet_twsk_kill(), inet_twsk_free(), inet_twdr_do_twkill_work(),
> >    inet_twdr_twcal_tick(), and tcp_timewait_state_process().  RCU is used
> >    by inet_twsk_purge().  Locking is used by established_get_first()
> >    and established_get_next().  Finally, __inet_twsk_hashdance() is an
> >    initialization case.
> >
> >    It appears to be non-trivial to locate the appropriate locks and
> >    reference counts from within twsk_net(), so used rcu_dereference_raw().
> >
> >    Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >
> > diff --git a/include/net/inet_timewait_sock.h b/include/net/inet_timewait_sock.h
> > index 79f67ea..a066fdd 100644
> > --- a/include/net/inet_timewait_sock.h
> > +++ b/include/net/inet_timewait_sock.h
> > @@ -224,7 +224,9 @@ static inline
> >  struct net *twsk_net(const struct inet_timewait_sock *twsk)
> >  {
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_NET_NS
> > -       return rcu_dereference(twsk->tw_net);
> > +       return rcu_dereference_raw(twsk->tw_net); /* protected by locking, */
> > +                                                 /* reference counting, */
> > +                                                 /* initialization, or RCU. */
> >  #else
> >        return &init_net;
> >  #endif
> >
> 
> Worked for me.  Thanks!

Thank you both!  I have added Eric's Acked-by and Miles's Tested-by.

							Thanx, Paul

  reply	other threads:[~2010-04-27 23:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 75+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-08  1:26 INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage - include/linux/cgroup.h:492 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection! Miles Lane
2010-03-11  3:28 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-12 18:44   ` Eric Paris
2010-04-12 18:47     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-14 10:47       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-15 15:47         ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-19  3:45           ` Lai Jiangshan
2010-04-19 18:26         ` Eric Paris
2010-04-19 23:01           ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-20  1:25             ` Eric Paris
2010-04-20  3:04               ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-20  7:21                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-20  8:23                 ` [PATCH] RCU: don't turn off lockdep when find suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage Lai Jiangshan
2010-04-20  8:36                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-20 12:31                   ` Eric Paris
2010-04-20 13:28                     ` Paul E. McKenney
     [not found]                     ` <j2ya44ae5cd1004200545q6be4ec82o18ae99d93e8c29c7@mail.gmail.com>
2010-04-20 13:52                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-20 15:38                         ` Miles Lane
2010-04-21  6:04                           ` Borislav Petkov
2010-04-21 21:45                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-21 21:35                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-21 21:48                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-21 21:57                             ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-21 22:14                               ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-21 23:26                                 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-04-22 14:56                             ` Vivek Goyal
2010-04-22 16:01                               ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-23 12:50                                 ` Miles Lane
2010-04-23 19:42                                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-23 19:43                                     ` [PATCH v2.6.34-rc5 01/12] rcu: Fix RCU lockdep splat in set_task_cpu on fork path Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-23 19:43                                     ` [PATCH v2.6.34-rc5 02/12] rcu: fix RCU lockdep splat on freezer_fork path Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-23 19:43                                     ` [PATCH v2.6.34-rc5 03/12] rcu: leave lockdep enabled after RCU lockdep splat Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-23 19:43                                     ` [PATCH v2.6.34-rc5 04/12] NFSv4: Fix the locking in nfs_inode_reclaim_delegation() Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-23 19:43                                     ` [PATCH v2.6.34-rc5 05/12] NFS: Fix RCU issues in the NFSv4 delegation code Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-23 19:43                                     ` [PATCH v2.6.34-rc5 06/12] KEYS: Fix an RCU warning Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-23 19:43                                     ` [PATCH v2.6.34-rc5 07/12] KEYS: Fix an RCU warning in the reading of user keys Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-23 19:43                                     ` [PATCH v2.6.34-rc5 08/12] cgroup: Fix an RCU warning in cgroup_path() Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-23 19:43                                     ` [PATCH v2.6.34-rc5 09/12] cgroup: Fix an RCU warning in alloc_css_id() Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-23 19:43                                     ` [PATCH v2.6.34-rc5 10/12] sched: Fix an RCU warning in print_task() Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-23 19:43                                     ` [PATCH v2.6.34-rc5 11/12] cgroup: Check task_lock in task_subsys_state() Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-23 19:43                                     ` [PATCH v2.6.34-rc5 12/12] memcg: css_id() must be called under rcu_read_lock() Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-23 22:59                                     ` [PATCH] RCU: don't turn off lockdep when find suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage Miles Lane
2010-04-24  5:35                                       ` Miles Lane
2010-04-25  2:36                                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-25  2:34                                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-25  7:45                                         ` Johannes Berg
2010-04-25  7:49                                           ` David Miller
2010-04-26  2:07                                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-25 15:49                                         ` Miles Lane
2010-04-25 20:20                                           ` Miles Lane
2010-04-26 16:09                                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-26 18:35                                               ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-04-27  4:27                                                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-27 16:22                                                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-27 16:33                                                     ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-27 17:58                                                     ` Miles Lane
2010-04-27 23:31                                                       ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2010-04-27 23:42                                                         ` David Miller
2010-04-27 23:52                                                           ` Paul E. McKenney
     [not found]                                         ` <p2ka44ae5cd1004281358n86ce29d2tbece16b2fb974dab@mail.gmail.com>
2010-04-28 21:37                                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-01 17:26                         ` Miles Lane
2010-05-01 21:55                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-02  2:00                             ` Miles Lane
2010-05-02  4:11                               ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-21  1:05             ` INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage - include/linux/cgroup.h:492 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection! Li Zefan
2010-04-21  3:14               ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-14 16:03     ` Paul E. McKenney
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-06-01 13:06 [PATCH] RCU: don't turn off lockdep when find suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage Daniel J Blueman
2010-06-02 14:56 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-06-02 15:24   ` Daniel J Blueman
2010-06-03  9:22   ` Li Zefan
2010-06-03 18:30     ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-06-04  2:44       ` Li Zefan
2010-06-04  4:10         ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-06-04  8:54           ` Daniel J Blueman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100427233111.GF2424@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=eparis@redhat.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=miles.lane@gmail.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=nauman@google.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox