public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <compudj@krystal.dyndns.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@redhat.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10][RFC] tracing: Lowering the footprint of TRACE_EVENTs
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 16:18:04 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100428201804.GA8591@Krystal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100426195024.256424113@goodmis.org>

* Steven Rostedt (rostedt@goodmis.org) wrote:
> This is an RFC patch set that also affects kprobes and perf.

Hi Steven,

> 
> At the Linux Collaboration Summit, I talked with Mathieu and others about
> lowering the footprint of trace events. I spent all of last week
> trying to get the size as small as I could.
> 
> Currently, each TRACE_EVENT() macro adds 1 - 5K per tracepoint. I got various
> results by adding a TRACE_EVENT() with the compiler, depending on
> config options that did not seem related. The new tracepoint I added
> would add between 1 and 5K, but I did not investigate enough to
> see what the true size was.

Adding only one might not give an accurate picture, as some sections can
be aligned on 4k boundaries. So if the added TRACE_EVENT() brings you to
the next 4k page, your added size is bumped of an extra 4k.

> 
> What was consistent, was the DEFINE_EVENT(). Currently, it adds
> a little over 700 bytes per DEFINE_EVENT().
> 
> This patch series does not seem to affect TRACE_EVENT() much (had
> the same various sizes), but consistently brings DEFINE_EVENT()s
> down from 700 bytes to 250 bytes per DEFINE_EVENT(). Since syscalls
> use one "class" and are equivalent to DEFINE_EVENT() this can
> be a significant savings.
> 
> With events and syscalls (82 events and 616 syscalls), before this
> patch series, the size of vmlinux was: 16161794, and afterward: 16058182.
> 
> That is 103,612 bytes in savings! (over 100K)
> 
> 
> Without tracing syscalls (82 events), it brought the size of vmlinux
> down from 1591046 to 15999394.

Probably a cut n paste error on the line above. Should read:

down from 16021465 to 15999394.

if you want the "22071 bytes in savings" to hold.

Will look over your patchset.

Thanks,

Mathieu

> 
> 22,071 bytes in savings.
> 
> This is just an RFC (for now), to get peoples opinions on the changes.
> It does a bit of rewriting of the CPP macros, just to warning you ;-)
> 
> -- Steve
> 
> The code can be found at:
> 
>   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rostedt/linux-2.6-trace.git
> tip/tracing/rfc-1
> 
> 
> Steven Rostedt (10):
>       tracing: Create class struct for events
>       tracing: Let tracepoints have data passed to tracepoint callbacks
>       tracing: Convert TRACE_EVENT() to use the DECLARE_TRACE_DATA()
>       tracing: Remove per event trace registering
>       tracing: Move fields from event to class structure
>       tracing: Move raw_init from events to class
>       tracing: Allow events to share their print functions
>       tracing: Move print functions into event class
>       tracing: Remove duplicate id information in event structure
>       tracing: Combine event filter_active and enable into single flags field
> 
> ----
>  include/linux/ftrace_event.h         |   71 +++++++++---
>  include/linux/syscalls.h             |   55 +++-------
>  include/linux/tracepoint.h           |  119 ++++++++++++++++---
>  include/trace/ftrace.h               |  215 ++++++++++------------------------
>  include/trace/syscall.h              |    9 +-
>  kernel/trace/blktrace.c              |   13 ++-
>  kernel/trace/kmemtrace.c             |   28 +++--
>  kernel/trace/trace.c                 |    9 +-
>  kernel/trace/trace.h                 |    5 +-
>  kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c      |   17 ++-
>  kernel/trace/trace_events.c          |  126 +++++++++++++-------
>  kernel/trace/trace_events_filter.c   |   28 +++--
>  kernel/trace/trace_export.c          |   16 ++-
>  kernel/trace/trace_functions_graph.c |    2 +-
>  kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c          |  104 ++++++++++-------
>  kernel/trace/trace_output.c          |  137 +++++++++++++++-------
>  kernel/trace/trace_output.h          |    2 +-
>  kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c        |  105 +++++++++++++++--
>  kernel/tracepoint.c                  |   91 ++++++++-------
>  19 files changed, 700 insertions(+), 452 deletions(-)
> 

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com

      parent reply	other threads:[~2010-04-28 20:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-04-26 19:50 [PATCH 00/10][RFC] tracing: Lowering the footprint of TRACE_EVENTs Steven Rostedt
2010-04-26 19:50 ` [PATCH 01/10][RFC] tracing: Create class struct for events Steven Rostedt
2010-04-28 20:22   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-04-28 20:38     ` Steven Rostedt
2010-04-26 19:50 ` [PATCH 02/10][RFC] tracing: Let tracepoints have data passed to tracepoint callbacks Steven Rostedt
2010-04-27  9:08   ` Li Zefan
2010-04-27 15:28     ` Steven Rostedt
2010-04-28 20:37   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-04-28 23:56     ` Steven Rostedt
2010-04-26 19:50 ` [PATCH 03/10][RFC] tracing: Convert TRACE_EVENT() to use the DECLARE_TRACE_DATA() Steven Rostedt
2010-04-28 20:39   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-04-28 23:57     ` Steven Rostedt
2010-04-29  0:03       ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-04-26 19:50 ` [PATCH 04/10][RFC] tracing: Remove per event trace registering Steven Rostedt
2010-04-28 20:44   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-04-29  0:00     ` Steven Rostedt
2010-04-29  0:05       ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-04-29  0:20         ` Steven Rostedt
     [not found]           ` <20100429133649.GC14617@Krystal>
2010-04-29 14:06             ` Steven Rostedt
2010-04-29 14:55               ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-04-29 16:06                 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-04-30 17:09                   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-04-30 18:16                     ` Steven Rostedt
2010-04-30 19:06                       ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-04-30 19:48                         ` Steven Rostedt
2010-04-30 20:07                           ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-04-30 20:14                             ` Steven Rostedt
2010-04-30 21:02                               ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-04-26 19:50 ` [PATCH 05/10][RFC] tracing: Move fields from event to class structure Steven Rostedt
2010-04-28 20:58   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-04-29  0:02     ` Steven Rostedt
     [not found]       ` <20100429133213.GA14617@Krystal>
2010-04-29 13:50         ` Steven Rostedt
2010-04-26 19:50 ` [PATCH 06/10][RFC] tracing: Move raw_init from events to class Steven Rostedt
2010-04-28 21:00   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-04-26 19:50 ` [PATCH 07/10][RFC] tracing: Allow events to share their print functions Steven Rostedt
2010-04-28 21:03   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-04-26 19:50 ` [PATCH 08/10][RFC] tracing: Move print functions into event class Steven Rostedt
2010-04-28 21:03   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-04-26 19:50 ` [PATCH 09/10][RFC] tracing: Remove duplicate id information in event structure Steven Rostedt
2010-04-28 21:06   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-04-29  0:04     ` Steven Rostedt
2010-04-26 19:50 ` [PATCH 10/10][RFC] tracing: Combine event filter_active and enable into single flags field Steven Rostedt
2010-04-28 21:13   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-04-28 14:45 ` [PATCH 00/10][RFC] tracing: Lowering the footprint of TRACE_EVENTs Masami Hiramatsu
2010-04-28 20:18 ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100428201804.GA8591@Krystal \
    --to=compudj@krystal.dyndns.org \
    --cc=acme@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=mhiramat@redhat.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox