From: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] Simple fan question
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 10:57:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100429105740.6e3b7716@hyperion.delvare> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1272518506.24542.163.camel@pasglop>
Hi Ben,
On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 15:21:46 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> I'm writing some support for d-link dns323 rev C1 NAS. It has a fan that
> is controlled by some non-programmable PWM circuit. Basically, all I can
> do is tweak to GPIOs that controls the feed into the circuitry for the
> fans to be off, slow or fast.
>
> I don't know what the actual PWM values are for "slow" or "fast". I
> -might- be able to do some measurements but I can't promise it.
>
> Now I'm trying to do a simple hwmon driver for that in order to easy
> userspace support for these guys, and I don't really see a 'nice' way to
> expose that which would fit the interfaces documented
> Documentation/hwmon/sysfs-interface.
>
> So before I do something horrible, I felt I might poke you guys see if
> you have a good idea here :-)
>
> Before I read the above document I was thinking about a sysfs file that
> contains "off", "slow" or "fast" but it looks like this won't fit at all
> the typical hwmon APIs.
Indeed, that wouldn't fit. The nearest entry in the document is:
pwm[1-*] Pulse width modulation fan control.
Integer value in the range 0 to 255
RW
255 is max or 100%.
In your case, the file would have only 3 possible values, with "off"
mapping to 0, and "slow" and "fast" mapping to arbitrary positive
values, like 64 and 192 or whatever you think is suitable. I understand
that in your case, you don't really control the PWM output directly,
but we do not have any interface for this, and I don't think there
would be much value in adding one.
That being said, I am also only mildly convinced that fitting your chip
in the standard pwm1 interface will be very helpful. I don't really
expect tools such as the fancontrol script to behave properly when the
pwm1 file only support a small number of discrete values. So the
benefit of using the standard file name and semantics seems thin.
> Another comment while at it is when implementing the thermal control for
> PowerMacs a while back (windfarm etc...) I had to deal with two
> different type of interfaces to fans. RPM controlled and PWM controlled.
>
> The later basically let me program a percentile value (a percent of the
> duty cycle).
This is exactly what pwm[1-*] files are about, except that we used
range 0-255 instead of 0-100 for historical and practical reasons.
> I looks like the described sysfs interface only does RPM, or at least
> doesn't provide a way to expose the units used...
For RPM-controlled, look at the following entry instead:
fan[1-*]_target
Desired fan speed
Unit: revolution/min (RPM)
RW
Only makes sense if the chip supports closed-loop fan speed
control based on the measured fan speed.
One significant difference is that, in this case, you always know which
fan you control, while in the pwm[1-*] case you don't.
--
Jean Delvare
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-30 17:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-29 5:21 Simple fan question Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-04-29 8:57 ` Jean Delvare [this message]
2010-04-29 22:56 ` [lm-sensors] " Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-05-06 16:40 ` Jean Delvare
2010-05-17 7:46 ` Pavel Machek
2010-05-17 8:14 ` Jean Delvare
2010-05-17 8:30 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
[not found] ` <AANLkTilRvyWK-SEp2pgVAosaJ8GQUbbXsP4BkZBxGphU@mail.gmail.com>
2010-05-20 11:57 ` Jean Delvare
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100429105740.6e3b7716@hyperion.delvare \
--to=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox