From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933304Ab0ECQcc (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 May 2010 12:32:32 -0400 Received: from va3ehsobe004.messaging.microsoft.com ([216.32.180.14]:14814 "EHLO VA3EHSOBE004.bigfish.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933052Ab0ECQcb (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 May 2010 12:32:31 -0400 X-SpamScore: -5 X-BigFish: VPS-5(zz98dNzz1202hzzz32i87h2a8h61h) X-Spam-TCS-SCL: 0:0 X-FB-DOMAIN-IP-MATCH: fail X-WSS-ID: 0L1UR9W-02-9O6-02 X-M-MSG: Date: Mon, 3 May 2010 18:32:21 +0200 From: Joerg Roedel To: Avi Kivity CC: Marcelo Tosatti , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/22] KVM: MMU: Track page fault data in struct vcpu Message-ID: <20100503163221.GB28950@amd.com> References: <1272364712-17425-1-git-send-email-joerg.roedel@amd.com> <1272364712-17425-17-git-send-email-joerg.roedel@amd.com> <4BD6DF7C.1090203@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4BD6DF7C.1090203@redhat.com> Organization: Advanced Micro Devices =?iso-8859-1?Q?GmbH?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?=2C_Karl-Hammerschmidt-Str=2E_34=2C_85609_Dornach_bei_M=FC?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?nchen=2C_Gesch=E4ftsf=FChrer=3A_Thomas_M=2E_McCoy=2C_Giuli?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?ano_Meroni=2C_Andrew_Bowd=2C_Sitz=3A_Dornach=2C_Gemeinde_A?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?schheim=2C_Landkreis_M=FCnchen=2C_Registergericht_M=FCnche?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?n=2C?= HRB Nr. 43632 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Reverse-DNS: ausb3extmailp02.amd.com Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 03:58:36PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote: > So we probably need to upgrade gva_t to a u64. Please send this as > a separate patch, and test on i386 hosts. Are there _any_ regular tests of KVM on i386 hosts? For me this is terribly broken (also after I fixed the issue which gave me a VMEXIT_INVALID at the first vmrun). Joerg