public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@us.ibm.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: torvalds@osdl.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	keyrings@linux-nfs.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] KEYS: Fix an RCU warning in the reading of user keys
Date: Mon, 3 May 2010 17:04:20 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100503220420.GA6968@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100430133208.2126.56765.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk>

Quoting David Howells (dhowells@redhat.com):
> Fix an RCU warning in the reading of user keys:
> 
> ===================================================
> [ INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage. ]
> ---------------------------------------------------
> security/keys/user_defined.c:202 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection!
> 
> other info that might help us debug this:
> 
> 
> rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 0
> 1 lock held by keyctl/3637:
>  #0:  (&key->sem){+++++.}, at: [<ffffffff811a80ae>] keyctl_read_key+0x9c/0xcf
> 
> stack backtrace:
> Pid: 3637, comm: keyctl Not tainted 2.6.34-rc5-cachefs #18
> Call Trace:
>  [<ffffffff81051f6c>] lockdep_rcu_dereference+0xaa/0xb2
>  [<ffffffff811aa55f>] user_read+0x47/0x91
>  [<ffffffff811a80be>] keyctl_read_key+0xac/0xcf
>  [<ffffffff811a8a06>] sys_keyctl+0x75/0xb7
>  [<ffffffff81001eeb>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>

heck it also serves to document it a bit, as looking at the fn
itself it's not clear that it is called under key->sem.

Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com>

> ---
> 
>  security/keys/user_defined.c |    3 ++-
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/security/keys/user_defined.c b/security/keys/user_defined.c
> index 7c687d5..e9aa079 100644
> --- a/security/keys/user_defined.c
> +++ b/security/keys/user_defined.c
> @@ -199,7 +199,8 @@ long user_read(const struct key *key, char __user *buffer, size_t buflen)
>  	struct user_key_payload *upayload;
>  	long ret;
> 
> -	upayload = rcu_dereference(key->payload.data);
> +	upayload = rcu_dereference_protected(
> +		key->payload.data, rwsem_is_locked(&((struct key *)key)->sem));
>  	ret = upayload->datalen;
> 
>  	/* we can return the data as is */
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-05-03 22:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-04-30 13:32 [PATCH 1/7] KEYS: Fix an RCU warning in the reading of user keys David Howells
2010-04-30 13:32 ` [PATCH 2/7] KEYS: find_keyring_by_name() can gain access to a freed keyring David Howells
2010-05-03 22:14   ` Serge E. Hallyn
2010-04-30 13:32 ` [PATCH 3/7] KEYS: Use RCU dereference wrappers in keyring key type code David Howells
2010-05-03 22:30   ` Serge E. Hallyn
2010-05-04 13:00     ` David Howells
2010-04-30 13:32 ` [PATCH 4/7] KEYS: call_sbin_request_key() must write lock keyrings before modifying them David Howells
2010-04-30 13:32 ` [PATCH 5/7] KEYS: keyring_serialise_link_sem is only needed for keyring->keyring links David Howells
2010-04-30 13:32 ` [PATCH 6/7] KEYS: Better handling of errors from construct_alloc_key() David Howells
2010-04-30 13:32 ` [PATCH 7/7] KEYS: Do preallocation for __key_link() David Howells
2010-05-03 22:04 ` Serge E. Hallyn [this message]
2010-05-04 12:48   ` [PATCH 1/7] KEYS: Fix an RCU warning in the reading of user keys David Howells
2010-05-06  2:45 ` James Morris
2010-05-06 10:38   ` David Howells
2010-05-06 12:25     ` James Morris

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100503220420.GA6968@us.ibm.com \
    --to=serue@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=keyrings@linux-nfs.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox