From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757433Ab0EDJML (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 May 2010 05:12:11 -0400 Received: from tx2ehsobe005.messaging.microsoft.com ([65.55.88.15]:18838 "EHLO TX2EHSOBE010.bigfish.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756211Ab0EDJMI (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 May 2010 05:12:08 -0400 X-SpamScore: -26 X-BigFish: VPS-26(zz1432P98dN936eM9371Pzz1202hzzz32i87h2a8h61h) X-Spam-TCS-SCL: 0:0 X-FB-DOMAIN-IP-MATCH: fail X-WSS-ID: 0L1W1JY-01-4CJ-02 X-M-MSG: Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 11:11:58 +0200 From: "Roedel, Joerg" To: Avi Kivity CC: Marcelo Tosatti , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/22] KVM: MMU: Track page fault data in struct vcpu Message-ID: <20100504091157.GC28950@amd.com> References: <1272364712-17425-1-git-send-email-joerg.roedel@amd.com> <1272364712-17425-17-git-send-email-joerg.roedel@amd.com> <4BD6DF7C.1090203@redhat.com> <20100503163221.GB28950@amd.com> <4BDFD295.7000702@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4BDFD295.7000702@redhat.com> Organization: Advanced Micro Devices =?iso-8859-1?Q?GmbH?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?=2C_Karl-Hammerschmidt-Str=2E_34=2C_85609_Dornach_bei_M=FC?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?nchen=2C_Gesch=E4ftsf=FChrer=3A_Thomas_M=2E_McCoy=2C_Giuli?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?ano_Meroni=2C_Andrew_Bowd=2C_Sitz=3A_Dornach=2C_Gemeinde_A?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?schheim=2C_Landkreis_M=FCnchen=2C_Registergericht_M=FCnche?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?n=2C?= HRB Nr. 43632 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Reverse-DNS: ausb3extmailp02.amd.com Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 03:53:57AM -0400, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 05/03/2010 07:32 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 03:58:36PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote: > > > >> So we probably need to upgrade gva_t to a u64. Please send this as > >> a separate patch, and test on i386 hosts. > >> > > Are there _any_ regular tests of KVM on i386 hosts? For me this is > > terribly broken (also after I fixed the issue which gave me a > > VMEXIT_INVALID at the first vmrun). > > > > > > No, apart from the poor users. I'll try to set something up using nsvm. Ok. I will post an initial fix for the VMEXIT_INVALID bug soon. Apart from that I get a lockdep warning when I try to start a guest. The guest actually boots if it is single-vcpu. SMP guests don't even boot through the BIOS for me. Joerg